Breakdown of Keşke soy ağacımızdaki bütün atalarımızı tanısaydık.
tanımak
to know (a person), to recognize
bütün
all, whole
keşke
if only / I wish
soy ağacı
family tree
Questions & Answers about Keşke soy ağacımızdaki bütün atalarımızı tanısaydık.
Why does tanısaydık use both the conditional -sa and the past tense -ydı?
When combined with keşke (if only / I wish), this double suffix creates the unreal past. The conditional -sa connects to the wish, and the past tense -ydı shows it is about something that didn't happen in the past. Together, tanısaydık means 'we had known.'
How do all the suffixes in soy ağacımızdaki fit together?
The base is the compound noun soy ağacı (family tree). When we add the possessive -mız (our), it replaces the compound's default -ı ending, becoming soy ağacımız (our family tree). Then we add the locative -da (in), and finally -ki (that which is). It translates to 'that which is in our family tree.'
Why does atalarımızı end with an extra -ı?
That final -ı is the accusative case marker. Because atalarımız (our ancestors) is the specific direct object of the verb tanımak (to know/recognize), we must mark it. The breakdown is ata (ancestor) + -lar (plural) + -ımız (our) + -ı (specific direct object).
Since this lesson is about acaba (I wonder), could we add it to this sentence?