Rolü figürana ezberleteyim mi?

From Lesson 190:Causative objects·Turkish

Questions & Answers about Rolü figürana ezberleteyim mi?

Why does figürana have the dative ending -a here instead of the accusative?
This is the golden rule of the causative voice! The base verb ezberlemek (to memorize) is transitive, meaning it takes a direct object. In this sentence, that object is the role (rolü, which takes the accusative case). Because the accusative slot is already taken, the person being made to do the action (the causee, figüran) gets bumped to the dative case (-a).
How do you break down the suffixes in ezberleteyim?
It breaks down like this: ezberle- (to memorize) + -t (causative suffix: to make someone memorize) + -eyim (optative suffix: let me / shall I). Because the verb root ezberle- ends in a vowel, we use the -t causative suffix instead of -dir.
What is the function of -eyim mi together?
The -eyim ending is the first-person singular optative, which on its own means "let me [do it]". But when you pair it with the question particle mi, it becomes a request for input, translating beautifully to "Shall I...?" or "Should I...?". Here, it means "Shall I make [them] memorize?"
Why is it rolü with a front vowel (ü) when the word rol has a back vowel (o)?
Rol is a loanword borrowed from French. Like a few other foreign words in Turkish (such as saat or harf), its final consonant is pronounced softly, causing it to break standard vowel harmony rules. It takes front-vowel suffixes, which is why the accusative form is rolü instead of rolu.

Learn Rolü figürana ezberleteyim mi and more in Turkish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free