เขา โต้เถียง เจ้าพนักงาน เปล่าๆ ครับ

Questions & Answers about เขา โต้เถียง เจ้าพนักงาน เปล่าๆ ครับ

How does เปล่าๆ work at the end of this sentence?
It acts as an adverb meaning "in vain" or "for nothing." By placing it at the very end of the action clause (โต้เถียงเจ้าพนักงาน), it shows that the entire effort of arguing with the officer was completely pointless and yielded no result.
What is the difference between โต้เถียง and just using เถียง for "argue"?
เถียง is the everyday word for "argue" or "talk back" (like a child to a parent). โต้เถียง combines โต้ (to counter/retort) with เถียง, making it a more formal or intense two-way dispute. It fits perfectly here because arguing with an official is a serious, often legal, confrontation.
Why use the long word เจ้าพนักงาน instead of just ตำรวจ (police) or พนักงาน (staff)?
เจ้าพนักงาน is a formal, legal term for a "public official" or "authorized officer" on duty. It implies someone who has the backing of the law (like a customs agent, bailiff, or police officer). That legal authority is exactly why arguing with them is เปล่าๆ (futile).
Wait, isn't เปล่า the word for "empty" or "no"? How does it become "in vain"?
Exactly! เปล่า on its own means "empty," "bare," or "no." When you duplicate it with the mai yamok symbol (ๆ) to make เปล่าๆ, it turns into an adverb describing an action done "emptily" or without any substance or result—hence, "in vain" or "for nothing."

Learn เขา โต้เถียง เจ้าพนักงาน เปล่าๆ ครับ and more in Thai

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free