Förklaringen till ilskan är företagets nya krav på betalning.

Questions & Answers about Förklaringen till ilskan är företagets nya krav på betalning.

Why do we use till after Förklaringen instead of a literal translation like för?
In Swedish, the abstract noun en förklaring (an explanation) specifically requires the preposition till. Just like en orsak till (a reason for), you use till to link the explanation to the event or thing being explained, which in this case is ilskan.
Why is the preposition used in the phrase krav på betalning?
The noun ett krav (a demand or requirement) pairs with the preposition to indicate what is being demanded. While English says a demand "for" payment, Swedish idiomatically places a demand "on" payment.
Since ett krav is an ett-word, why is the adjective written as nya instead of nytt?
The adjective follows the possessive noun företagets (the company's). Whenever an adjective comes directly after a possessive word or an -s genitive, it must take the definite form, which ends in -a. This is why we use nya regardless of whether the noun is an en-word or an ett-word.
If the phrase is definite because of the possessive företagets, why is the noun in the indefinite form krav rather than kravet?
This is a classic Swedish grammar rule that often trips learners up. While a possessive triggers the definite form of the adjective (nya), it forces the noun itself to stay in the bare, indefinite form (krav). You would either say det nya kravet or företagets nya krav, but never mix the two structures.

Learn Förklaringen till ilskan är företagets nya krav på betalning and more in Swedish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free