Questions & Answers about Jag råkade ge honom fel dokument.
Why is there no att before the verb ge?
In this sentence, råka functions as an auxiliary (or semi-modal) verb indicating that an action was done accidentally or by chance. Just like standard modal verbs such as kan or måste, it is followed by the bare infinitive of the main verb without att.
Does råka always mean "accidentally"?
When followed directly by a bare infinitive like ge, it almost always translates to doing something "accidentally" or "happening to" do something. However, as a standalone verb without an infinitive, råka can mean "to meet" or "to end up," such as in vi råkades på stan (we met in town) or han råkade illa ut (he ended up in trouble).
The English translation says "the wrong document." Why isn't the Swedish noun in the definite form, like fel dokumentet?
The word fel is an invariable adjective, meaning it never changes its ending. When it is placed directly before a noun to mean "the wrong [noun]," it acts almost like a determiner itself. Because of this, it forces the noun that follows it to remain in the indefinite form. You will see this pattern in phrases like fel person (the wrong person) or på fel plats (in the wrong place).
Could I reword the end of the sentence as ge fel dokument till honom?