Questions & Answers about Pojken ramlade i sjön och höll på att drunkna.
I learned that höll på att means an ongoing action, like 'was doing'. Why does it mean 'almost' here?
You are right that hålla på att often marks an ongoing action. However, when paired with a verb that describes a sudden event or a final result, like drunkna (to drown) or ramla (to fall), it changes meaning. Instead of meaning the action was ongoing, it means the action was on the very brink of happening but was averted, translating to 'almost' or 'was about to'.
Could I just use nästan instead of höll på att in this sentence?
Yes, you could say och drunknade nästan, but höll på att drunkna sounds more dramatic and natural for a narrow escape. nästan is a general adverb for 'almost,' while höll på att specifically highlights that the event was right on the verge of happening before it was stopped.
Why is drunkna in the infinitive form instead of the past tense to match ramlade and höll?
The construction uses höll på followed by the infinitive marker att. Because of the att, the following verb must always be in its bare infinitive form (drunkna), even though the near-miss happened in the past.
Why is the preposition i used here for 'into the lake' instead of a directional preposition like in i?