Question 1

I learned that höll på att means an ongoing action, like 'was doing'. Why does it mean 'almost' here?

Accepted Answer

You are right that hålla på att often marks an ongoing action. However, when paired with a verb that describes a sudden event or a final result, like drunkna (to drown) or ramla (to fall), it changes meaning. Instead of meaning the action was ongoing, it means the action was on the very brink of happening but was averted, translating to 'almost' or 'was about to'.

Question 2

Could I just use nästan instead of höll på att in this sentence?

Accepted Answer

Yes, you could say och drunknade nästan, but höll på att drunkna sounds more dramatic and natural for a narrow escape. nästan is a general adverb for 'almost,' while höll på att specifically highlights that the event was right on the verge of happening before it was stopped.

Question 3

Why is drunkna in the infinitive form instead of the past tense to match ramlade and höll?

Accepted Answer

The construction uses höll på followed by the infinitive marker att. Because of the att, the following verb must always be in its bare infinitive form (drunkna), even though the near-miss happened in the past.

Question 4

Why is the preposition i used here for 'into the lake' instead of a directional preposition like in i?

Accepted Answer

In Swedish, falling into a body of water is simply expressed with i (in) rather than a complex directional preposition. in i is generally used for entering enclosed spaces, like a room or a building. So ramlade i sjön perfectly captures 'fell into the lake'.

Pojken ramlade i sjön och höll på att drunkna.

Breakdown of Pojken ramlade i sjön och höll på att drunkna.

Questions & Answers about Pojken ramlade i sjön och höll på att drunkna.

Learn Pojken ramlade i sjön och höll på att drunkna and more in Swedish