Questions & Answers about Hon hoppas att amuletten hon köpt ska bringa tur.
This lesson is about måtte (expressing strong hopes). Why isn't it used here, and how could we rewrite the sentence to use it?
The verb hoppas (to hope) simply states a fact about her feelings, so it takes a standard subordinate clause with ska bringa (will bring). To use måtte for a more direct, passionate wish, you would drop Hon hoppas att and make it an independent exclamation: Måtte amuletten hon köpt bringa tur! (May the amulet she bought bring luck!).
Shouldn't it be hon har köpt instead of just hon köpt?
In written Swedish and polished speech, the auxiliary verb har (has/have) is frequently dropped in subordinate clauses. Because hon köpt is inside a relative clause (which is a type of subordinate clause), omitting har is perfectly correct and very common at this level.
Why is there no word for 'that' or 'which' between amuletten and hon?
Just like in English, you can drop the relative pronoun som (that/which) when it is the object of the relative clause. You could absolutely say amuletten som hon köpt, but leaving it out is very natural, exactly like saying 'the amulet she bought' instead of 'the amulet that she bought'.
Why use bringa instead of a more common verb for 'bring' like ta med?