Breakdown of Felet i artikeln var helt uppenbart.
vara
to be
i
in
felet
the mistake
artikeln
the article
helt
completely
uppenbar
obvious
Questions & Answers about Felet i artikeln var helt uppenbart.
Why use uppenbart here instead of the sentence adverb uppenbarligen?
In this sentence, uppenbart acts as an adjective describing the noun felet (the error was obvious). Uppenbarligen is a sentence adverb meaning "obviously" or "evidently," which expresses the speaker's attitude toward the whole sentence. You would use uppenbarligen if you wanted to say something like: Felet var uppenbarligen stort (The error was obviously big).
Since uppenbart ends in a 't', is it possible to read it as an adverb in this sentence?
No, it acts as an adjective here. It gets the -t ending because it must agree in gender with the ett-word it describes: ett fel (the error). However, the word right before it, helt (completely), is an adverb modifying the adjective, formed by adding -t to the adjective hel.
If I rewrote the sentence to use uppenbarligen, where would it go?
Sentence adverbs like uppenbarligen typically come immediately after the first verb in a main clause. So you would say: Felet i artikeln var uppenbarligen... (The error in the article was obviously...). Note that you would still need another adjective to finish the sentence, such as uppenbarligen oavsiktligt (obviously unintentional).
Could I say misstaget instead of felet?
You could, but they carry slightly different nuances. Ett fel points to an objective inaccuracy, defect, or incorrect fact, which is the natural choice for a typo or factual error in an article. Ett misstag emphasizes the human action of making a mistake or blunder.
Learn Felet i artikeln var helt uppenbart and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free