Word
Felet i artikeln var helt uppenbart.
Meaning
The error in the article was completely obvious.
Part of speech
sentence
Pronunciation
Course
Questions & Answers about Felet i artikeln var helt uppenbart.
Why use uppenbart here instead of the sentence adverb uppenbarligen?
In this sentence, uppenbart acts as an adjective describing the noun felet (the error was obvious). Uppenbarligen is a sentence adverb meaning "obviously" or "evidently," which expresses the speaker's attitude toward the whole sentence. You would use uppenbarligen if you wanted to say something like: Felet var uppenbarligen stort (The error was obviously big).
Since uppenbart ends in a 't', is it possible to read it as an adverb in this sentence?
No, it acts as an adjective here. It gets the -t ending because it must agree in gender with the ett-word it describes: ett fel (the error). However, the word right before it, helt (completely), is an adverb modifying the adjective, formed by adding -t to the adjective hel.
If I rewrote the sentence to use uppenbarligen, where would it go?
Sentence adverbs like uppenbarligen typically come immediately after the first verb in a main clause. So you would say: Felet i artikeln var uppenbarligen... (The error in the article was obviously...). Note that you would still need another adjective to finish the sentence, such as uppenbarligen oavsiktligt (obviously unintentional).
Could I say misstaget instead of felet?