Breakdown of Rutan blev ersatt, men skadan blev mycket värre.
mycket
much / very
men
but
bli
to become
skadan
the damage
rutan
the pane
ersatt
replaced
värre
worse
Questions & Answers about Rutan blev ersatt, men skadan blev mycket värre.
Why do we use mycket to intensify värre, instead of mer?
Just like in English where you say "much worse" rather than "more worse", Swedish uses mycket (much) to intensify a comparative word. You can also use lite (a little) or ännu (even). You cannot use mer (more) because värre is already in its comparative form.
Why is "worse" translated as värre here and not sämre?
Both words mean "worse", but they are used differently. Sämre usually describes a drop in quality or skill, like a worse phone or a worse player. Värre describes a bad situation becoming more severe, serious, or worse in degree. Since the damage is a physical situation that escalated, värre is the most natural choice here.
The sentence uses blev twice. Does it serve the same grammatical purpose both times?
No. The first blev is a helper verb used with the past participle ersatt to form the passive voice, meaning "was replaced" or "got replaced". The second blev is the main verb of its clause, simply meaning "became" or "got" (the damage got worse).
Could I use the s-passive form ersattes instead of blev ersatt?
Yes, rutan ersattes is grammatically correct and means the same thing. However, using blev + past participle is very common in everyday spoken Swedish, especially when focusing on the end result of the action (the pane ending up in a replaced state) rather than the ongoing action itself.
Learn Rutan blev ersatt, men skadan blev mycket värre and more in Swedish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free