Log inSign up

No digo categóricamente que el actor sea culpable.

No digo categóricamente que el actor sea culpable.
I do not categorically say that the actor is guilty.
From Lesson 480:Negative communication triggers (no decir que)·Spanish (Latin America)

Questions & Answers about No digo categóricamente que el actor sea culpable.

Why is sea in the subjunctive here instead of the indicative es?
Because the sentence uses No digo que... (I don't say that...). When verbs of communication like decir are negated, they stop merely reporting information and instead deny or cast doubt on the statement that follows. This requires the subjunctive (sea). If it were affirmative (Digo que...), you would use the indicative (es).
Does the adverb categóricamente affect the use of the subjunctive?
No, the grammatical rule remains exactly the same. The trigger is still the negated communication verb (No digo... que). The adverb simply describes how you are denying the statement, and it doesn't disrupt the trigger that forces the use of sea.
Why do we use the verb ser (conjugated here as sea) with culpable? Isn't guilt a temporary state?
It might feel temporary in English, but in Spanish, being guilty (culpable) or innocent (inocente) is treated as a defining characteristic or a legal identity rather than a passing condition or emotion. Because it is viewed as a characteristic, it always pairs with ser rather than estar.

Learn No digo categóricamente que el actor sea culpable and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free
Start learning Spanish →