Log inSign up

El testigo dijo que él presenciaba el crimen.

El testigo dijo que él presenciaba el crimen.
The witness said that he was witnessing the crime.
From Lesson 189:Reported speech for the present (dijo que...)·Spanish (Latin America)

Questions & Answers about El testigo dijo que él presenciaba el crimen.

Why is presenciaba in the imperfect tense here instead of the preterite?
This is the core rule of reported speech! The witness originally spoke in the present tense: yo presencio (I am witnessing). When we report those words later using a past tense verb like dijo (said), that original present tense shifts into the imperfect tense (presenciaba) to match the past timeline.
Why is él included? Doesn't the verb already tell us who was witnessing?
Normally yes, but the imperfect tense ending -aba is exactly the same for yo (I) and él/ella/usted (he/she/you formal). Because presenciaba could mean 'I was witnessing' or 'he was witnessing', adding él clears up the ambiguity so we know the witness was talking about himself.
If the witness was a woman, would the word change to la testiga?
No, the noun testigo is an exception that always ends in -o regardless of gender. To talk about a female witness, you only change the article: la testigo.
The English translation says 'was witnessing'. Could we also use the past progressive here, like estaba presenciando?
Yes, you could say dijo que él estaba presenciando el crimen. That emphasizes being right in the middle of the action. However, the standard imperfect tense (presenciaba) naturally translates to 'was witnessing' on its own, which is why it is used here and sounds perfectly natural.

Learn El testigo dijo que él presenciaba el crimen and more in Spanish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
  • ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free
Start learning Spanish →