Breakdown of Główna atrakcja ma znajdować się pod wodą.
woda
water
pod
under (+ Instrumental)
główny
main
znajdować się
to be located
mieć
to be supposed to
atrakcja
the attraction (f)
Questions & Answers about Główna atrakcja ma znajdować się pod wodą.
How does ma translate to "is said to" here instead of "has"?
In Polish, using mieć (to have) plus an infinitive is a common way to express hearsay, rumors, or unverified claims. It functions exactly like "is supposed to" or "is said to" in English. So, ma znajdować się means "is said to be located."
Could I just use być instead of znajdować się?
Yes, ma być pod wodą is completely correct and means the same thing. However, znajdować się (to be located / situated) is frequently used in Polish when describing the physical location of tourist sites, places, or buildings, making it sound a bit more descriptive and natural for a guidebook or brochure.
Why is wodą in the instrumental case after pod?
The preposition pod (under) requires the instrumental case when describing a static location (answering the question "where?"). If you were talking about motion directed underwater (answering "where to?", like diving under the surface), you would use the accusative case (pod wodę). Since the attraction is permanently sitting there, we use the instrumental.
Why use the imperfective znajdować się instead of the perfective znaleźć się?
The imperfective znajdować się describes an ongoing state ("it is located"). If you used the perfective znaleźć się, it would focus on the completion of an action, changing the meaning to "is said to end up underwater" or "is said to find itself underwater" (for example, as a result of an accident, a sinking, or a flood).
Learn Główna atrakcja ma znajdować się pod wodą and more in Polish
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free