Wymagania mojego szefa są zbyt nierealne, żeby im sprostać.

Questions & Answers about Wymagania mojego szefa są zbyt nierealne, żeby im sprostać.

Why do we need the pronoun im in the second part of the sentence when English just says 'to meet'?
In Polish, the correlative structure zbyt ... żeby (too ... to) connects two clauses, and the verb in the second clause still needs its object. While English drops the object in this pattern (saying just 'too unrealistic to meet'), Polish requires you to explicitly state what is being met using a pronoun. Here, im (them) refers back to wymagania (requirements).
Why is the pronoun im (dative) used instead of je (accusative)?
The case is determined by the verb sprostać (to meet a challenge or cope with). This verb strictly requires its object to be in the dative case. Since wymagania is a non-virile plural noun, its corresponding dative plural pronoun is im.
How exactly do you use the verb sprostać? Can I use it for meeting a person?
No, sprostać doesn't mean 'to meet' in the sense of encountering someone (which would be spotkać). It means 'to measure up to', 'to cope with', or 'to fulfill'. You will almost always see it paired with abstract nouns in the dative case, such as wymaganiom (requirements), oczekiwaniom (expectations), or wyzwaniu (a challenge).
Could I use za instead of zbyt in this sentence?
Yes, za nierealne and zbyt nierealne mean exactly the same thing here. Zbyt sounds slightly more formal and is great for writing, while za is very common in everyday speech. Both pair perfectly with żeby to express that something is too extreme to allow a result.

Learn Wymagania mojego szefa są zbyt nierealne, żeby im sprostać and more in Polish

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free