Questions & Answers about Ktoś puka. To musi być lokator.
Doesn't musi usually mean an obligation, like 'he has to'? How do we know it means 'probability' here?
Just like the English word 'must', the Polish verb musieć does double duty. It can express obligation, but here it expresses epistemic deduction—a logical conclusion based on evidence (the knocking). Context tells us you aren't forcing the tenant to exist; you are deducing that the person at the door is the tenant.
Why is lokator in the nominative case here? Doesn't the verb być require the instrumental case for identities?
You are right that być usually requires the instrumental case (for example, On musi być lokatorem). However, this sentence uses the identifying pronoun to (meaning 'it' or 'this'). Whenever you use the To + być + [noun] structure to identify someone or something, the noun must stay in the nominative case, even when you add a modal verb like musi in the middle.
If I wanted to say 'It must have been the tenant' (referring to a past event), how would this sentence change?
Could I just say To pewnie lokator instead?