Breakdown of Biurokracja w tym centrum to kompletny absurd.
ten
this (m)
w
in / on (a day)
to
is (linking copula)
centrum
the center
Questions & Answers about Biurokracja w tym centrum to kompletny absurd.
Why is to used here instead of jest to mean "is"?
When equating one noun phrase (biurokracja) with another noun phrase (kompletny absurd), Polish frequently uses the pronoun to as a linking word. When you use to, both nouns stay in the nominative case. If you used the verb jest, the second part would need to be in the instrumental case: jest kompletnym absurdem.
Why doesn't the noun centrum change its ending after the preposition w, which usually requires the locative case?
The word centrum is a borrowing from Latin and is completely indeclinable in the singular in Polish. Whether it is the subject, the object, or following a preposition like w, it remains exactly the same. It only changes its endings in the plural. Notice, however, that the pronoun before it still takes the correct locative ending (tym).
Could I use an adjective here instead, like saying the bureaucracy is "absurd"?
Yes, but the grammar would change. Because this sentence uses the linking word to, the second part must be a noun phrase, which is why we use the noun absurd. If you wanted to use the adjective absurdalna to match the feminine noun biurokracja, you would drop the to and use the normal verb for "to be": Biurokracja w tym centrum jest absurdalna.
How could I naturally add the generalizing subject człowiek to this complaint, since we are learning about it in this lesson?