Breakdown of Hundurinn var að elta þjófinn.
vera
to be
hundurinn
the dog
að
to (infinitive marker)
þjófurinn
the thief
elta
to chase
Questions & Answers about Hundurinn var að elta þjófinn.
How does the past continuous "was chasing" work here?
It uses the past tense of vera (to be) + að + the infinitive verb. In this sentence, we have var (was) + að + elta (to chase). This structure is used to describe an ongoing action in the past, matching the English "was doing something" pattern perfectly!
Why is the word for "the thief" spelled þjófinn instead of þjófurinn?
Þjófinn is in the accusative case because the thief is the direct object receiving the action of the verb elta (to chase). The base word is þjófur (thief). In the accusative, þjófur drops its ending to become þjóf, and when you attach the accusative definite article, it becomes þjófinn.
What case is hundurinn in?
It is in the nominative case because the dog is the subject performing the action. The base word is hundur (a dog). For masculine nouns in the nominative, we attach -inn to mean "the", making it hundurinn.
Could I just say Hundurinn elti þjófinn instead?
Yes, but it changes the meaning slightly. Hundurinn elti þjófinn is the simple past tense, meaning "The dog chased the thief." Using var að elta emphasizes that the chasing was an ongoing, continuous action at that specific moment in the past.
Learn Hundurinn var að elta þjófinn and more in Icelandic
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓ Practice with interactive exercises
- ✓ Track your progress with spaced repetition
- ✓Learn at your own pace — completely free