Question 1

This lesson focuses on the explanatory particle nefnilega, but this sentence uses af því að. How would we rephrase this to use nefnilega instead?

Accepted Answer

Because nefnilega acts as an explanatory adverb and not a conjunction, it cannot directly link two clauses like af því að does. Instead, you would split the thought into two sentences and place the particle after the verb: Vinnuflugan byggir vaxkökuna. Drottningin þarf hana nefnilega. (The worker bee builds the honeycomb. The queen needs it, you see.)

Question 2

Why does the sentence end with hana instead of the generic neuter word það for the word "it"?

Accepted Answer

In Icelandic, pronouns must always match the grammatical gender of the noun they replace, even for inanimate objects. Hana is the feminine accusative pronoun, used here because it refers back to the feminine noun vaxkökuna.

Question 3

Why is the object spelled vaxkökuna rather than its dictionary form vaxkakan?

Accepted Answer

It is the direct object of the verb byggir (builds), so it takes the accusative case. The base noun kaka changes to köku in the accusative, which triggers a U-shift that changes the first 'a' to 'ö'. When you add the feminine accusative definite article, it becomes vaxkökuna.

Question 4

How do the compound words vinnuflugan and vaxkökuna break down literally?

Accepted Answer

Vinnuflugan combines vinna (work) and fluga (fly or insect) with the definite article -n. Vaxkökuna combines vax (wax) and kaka (cake) with the definite article -na. So a honeycomb in Icelandic is literally a wax-cake!

Vinnuflugan byggir vaxkökuna af því að drottningin þarf hana.

Breakdown of Vinnuflugan byggir vaxkökuna af því að drottningin þarf hana.

Questions & Answers about Vinnuflugan byggir vaxkökuna af því að drottningin þarf hana.

Learn Vinnuflugan byggir vaxkökuna af því að drottningin þarf hana and more in Icelandic