Breakdown of Anneannem, kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi.
Questions & Answers about Anneannem, kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi.
Why is it anneannem and not just anneanne?
Because -m is the 1st person singular possessive suffix, so anneannem means my maternal grandmother.
- anneanne = maternal grandmother
- anneannem = my maternal grandmother
With family words, Turkish very often uses possessive endings when talking about your own relatives:
- annem = my mother
- babam = my father
- teyzem = my aunt
- anneannem = my maternal grandmother
So this is very natural Turkish.
Why is there a comma after Anneannem?
The comma is not required by the core grammar of the sentence. It mainly marks a slight pause or gives Anneannem a topical, emphasized feel.
Many people would simply write:
Anneannem kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi.
So the comma is stylistic here, not something you must always copy.
Why is kayısı reçeli built this way?
Kayısı reçeli is a very common Turkish noun compound pattern.
- kayısı = apricot
- reçel = jam
- kayısı reçeli = apricot jam
In this pattern, the first noun usually stays plain, and the second noun takes a compound ending, often -i / -ı / -u / -ü.
Other examples:
- elma suyu = apple juice
- domates çorbası = tomato soup
- köy ekmeği = village bread
So kayısı reçeli is just the normal way to say apricot jam.
Why does kayısı reçeli become kayısı reçelinin?
Because it is the possessor of the next noun, şekeri.
Turkish often uses a genitive + possessed noun structure:
- kayısı reçelinin şekeri = the sugar of the apricot jam
Here is the breakdown:
- kayısı reçeli = apricot jam
- kayısı reçelinin = of the apricot jam
The ending -nin is the genitive case here.
What does şekerini mean exactly, and why does it have so many endings?
Şekerini can be broken down like this:
- şeker = sugar
- şekeri = its sugar / the sugar of it
- şekerini = its sugar, as a definite direct object
More specifically:
- -i = 3rd person possessive
- -ni = accusative, with n as a buffer consonant after the possessive ending
So in kayısı reçelinin şekerini:
- kayısı reçelinin = of the apricot jam
- şekerini = its sugar
Together: the sugar of the apricot jam
The accusative is there because this noun is the direct object of azaltmak inside the reported clause.
Why is it azalttığını instead of a simpler form like azalttı or azaltmak?
Because after söyledi, Turkish usually uses a reported clause in a nominalized form.
So instead of saying something like:
- ... azalttı söyledi — not correct
Turkish says:
- ... azalttığını söyledi = said that he/she reduced it
This form turns the action into something like the fact that he/she reduced it, which can then become the object of söyledi.
A rough breakdown:
- azalt- = reduce
- -tığ-ı = a nominalized form meaning something like that he/she reduced
- -nı = accusative, because the whole clause is the object of söyledi
So azalttığını söyledi means said that he/she reduced.
Why is the verb azaltmak used, not azalmak?
Because azalmak and azaltmak are different:
- azalmak = to decrease, to become less
- azaltmak = to reduce something, to make something less
In this sentence, there is a direct object:
- şekerini = its sugar
So the meaning is to reduce the sugar, not the sugar decreased by itself.
That is why azaltmak is the correct verb here.
Who is the subject of azalttığını? Is it definitely the grandmother?
Not 100% from grammar alone. The subject of the reported clause is not stated explicitly, so Turkish leaves it to context.
Very often, listeners will understand it as the same 3rd-person subject as the main clause, so the natural interpretation is:
- My grandmother said that she reduced the sugar of the apricot jam
But if you want to make the subject explicit, Turkish can do that by putting it in the genitive:
- Ayşe'nin kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi. = He/She said that Ayşe reduced the sugar of the apricot jam.
So the sentence as written usually suggests she said that she did it, but context is what really settles it.
Why is söyledi at the very end?
Because Turkish normally prefers Subject–Object–Verb order, and the main verb often comes last.
Here the whole reported clause:
- kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını
is the object of:
- söyledi
So the structure is basically:
- Anneannem = subject
- kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını = what she said
- söyledi = said
That final-verb pattern is very typical in Turkish.
Is this direct speech or reported speech?
It is reported speech.
Turkish often reports speech with a nominalized clause plus a verb like söylemek.
So:
- ... azalttığını söyledi = said that he/she reduced it
If you wanted direct speech, you would give the exact words. For example, if the grandmother was speaking about herself:
- Anneannem, Kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttım, dedi.
That is direct speech.
The original sentence is the indirect, reported version.
Could Turkish say this in a different but similar way?
Yes. Turkish has several natural ways to report the same idea, depending on style and emphasis.
For example:
- Anneannem kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi.
- Anneannem, kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi.
- Anneannem kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söylemiş.
This adds a hearsay or reported-information feel.
But the important grammar in your sentence is the same:
- possessive/genitive chain in kayısı reçelinin şekerini
- reported clause in azalttığını
- main reporting verb söyledi
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning TurkishMaster Turkish — from Anneannem, kayısı reçelinin şekerini azalttığını söyledi to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions