Log inSign up

Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
But then, I realize that you are really listening.

Breakdown of Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

ama
but
gerçekten
really
sonra
then
senin
your
dinlemek
to listen
fark etmek
to realize
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Turkish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Turkish now

Questions & Answers about Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

Why is it senin and not just sen?

In this sentence, senin is in the genitive case (the "of" or "’s" form), and it’s needed because dinlediğini is acting like a noun:

  • senin gerçekten dinlediğini ≈ your really listening / the fact that you are really listening

In Turkish, when you turn a whole clause into a noun (a nominalized clause), the subject of that clause normally goes into the genitive case:

  • senin gelmen = your coming / the fact that you come
  • onun söylemesi = his/her saying (it)

So senin here is like the your in your listening, not like you in you listen.

What exactly does the ending -diğini in dinlediğini mean?

dinlediğini comes from dinlemek (to listen) and is built like this:

  • dinle- = listen
  • -dik (here as -diğ-) = makes a "fact that (someone) did/is doing" form
  • -in = your (2nd person singular possessive)
  • -i = object/accusative ending

Step by step:

  1. dinle- → verb stem: to listen
  2. dinle-dik → the fact that (someone) listened / is listening
    • Because of sound changes and harmony, this appears as dinlediğ-.
  3. dinlediğ-in → the fact that you listened / you are listening
  4. dinlediğ-in-i → the fact that you are listening as the object of another verb

So dinlediğini is a single word meaning "that you are listening", in object form.

Why is there an extra -i at the end of dinlediğini?

That final -i is the accusative case ending. It shows that the whole phrase senin gerçekten dinlediğini is the direct object of fark ediyorum:

  • Neyi fark ediyorum? → What do I realize?
    → Senin gerçekten dinlediğini (that you are really listening)

Compare:

  • Kitabı okuyorum. = I am reading the book. (kitab-ı = the book, in accusative)
  • Senin geldiğini biliyorum. = I know that you came / you are coming.
    • geldiğ-in-i = the fact that you came/are coming, in accusative

So the final -i marks the whole clause as the thing being realized.

Can I say Ama sonra, sen gerçekten dinliyorsun, fark ediyorum instead?

You can say it, and people will understand you, but it sounds more like two loosely connected sentences:

  • Ama sonra, sen gerçekten dinliyorsun, fark ediyorum.
    ≈ But then, you’re really listening, I realize.

It feels like an afterthought: "You’re really listening — I realize."

The original sentence is smoother and more standard, because it makes the "listening" part a clear object of fark ediyorum:

  • Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
    = But then, I realize that you are really listening.

In Turkish, when one verb is the object of another (I realize that you listen), the usual, natural pattern is this nominalized structure (senin … dinlediğini fark ediyorum) or a ki-clause (see below), rather than two independent finite verbs stuck together.

Can I drop senin and just say Ama sonra, gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum?

Yes, that is perfectly grammatical and very natural:

  • Ama sonra, gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

Why can senin be dropped?

Because the person is already shown on the word dinlediğini by the suffix -in (your). So even without senin, the listener knows it means "that *you are listening"*.

Including senin:

  • can add a bit of clarity or emphasis on you,
  • is slightly more explicit and can sound a bit more careful or formal.

So both are fine:

  • Senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
  • Gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
Why do we use fark ediyorum (present continuous) instead of fark ederim?

fark ediyorum with -yor focuses on what is happening now (or in this particular situation):

  • fark ediyorum = I realize / I’m realizing (now / at this point).

fark ederim with -er is more like:

  • a habitual or general fact: I (in general) notice / I tend to notice
  • or a prediction: I’ll notice (I’m sure I will).

In this context, you’re talking about a specific realization at a certain moment: "But then, I (come to) realize that you are really listening." So fark ediyorum is the natural choice.

Where can gerçekten go in the sentence? Can I move it?

Yes, gerçekten (really, truly) is quite flexible. All of these are possible, with slightly different emphasis:

  1. Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

    • Neutral and natural: I realize that you are really listening.

  2. Ama sonra, gerçekten senin dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

    • Emphasizes you as the one who is listening (as opposed to someone else).
    • Roughly: I really realize that it is *you who is listening.*

  3. Ama sonra, senin dinlediğini gerçekten fark ediyorum.

    • Slightly more emphasis on fark ediyorum (the realizing):
    • I really do realize that you’re listening.

  4. Ama sonra, gerçekten fark ediyorum senin dinlediğini. (more spoken)

    • Stronger emotional or contrastive tone: Then I really realize that you’re listening.

The original placement—right before dinlediğini—makes it clear that really modifies the listening, not the realizing.

Is the comma after sonra necessary? And what exactly does Ama sonra mean?

Ama sonra means "But then" or "But after that" in a discourse sense:

  • It contrasts with what came earlier: "At first X… but then Y."

About the comma:

  • Ama sonra, senin… — the comma is optional, but common in writing.
  • It marks a pause after a short introductory phrase ("But then,").

So both are acceptable:

  • Ama sonra, senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
  • Ama sonra senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.

In speech, you would naturally pause a bit after sonra, so many writers reflect that with a comma.

Why does dinlediğini look "past" (with -diğ-) if the meaning is "you are listening" in the present?

The -dik / -diğ- form in Turkish doesn’t always mean past tense.
Here it makes a verbal noun / object clause: "the fact that you (do) listen / are listening / listened."

The time of that action is understood from context and the main verb:

  • Senin geldiğini biliyorum.
    • Can mean: I know that you are coming (future/near future)
    • Or: I know that you came (past)
      → The form geldiğini itself is neutral; context tells you the time.

In your sentence:

  • fark ediyorum is present-time,
  • the situation is you are listening now,
  • so dinlediğini is understood as "that you are listening (now)", not as a completed past.

So -dik / -diğ- here is mainly a nominalizer, not a simple past marker.

Could I say Ama sonra, fark ediyorum ki sen gerçekten dinliyorsun? What’s the difference?

Yes, you can say:

  • Ama sonra, fark ediyorum ki sen gerçekten dinliyorsun.

This is also natural and common. The differences:

  1. Structure

    • fark ediyorum ki … keeps the second clause in a more "normal sentence" form:
      sen gerçekten dinliyorsun (you are really listening).
    • senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum turns it into a noun-like object.

  2. Style

    • The -diğini nominalized form is very standard and slightly more formal/neutral.
    • The ki construction is extremely common in speech and can feel a bit more conversational or emphatic, like "I realize that..." with a little extra stress on that.

  3. Equivalence

    • Senin gerçekten dinlediğini fark ediyorum.
    • Fark ediyorum ki sen gerçekten dinliyorsun.

    Both basically mean the same thing: "I realize that you are really listening."

So you can safely use either, but it’s good to be comfortable with the nominalized pattern, because it’s used all over Turkish.