Breakdown of Chefen vill avsluta mötet före lunch.
Questions & Answers about Chefen vill avsluta mötet före lunch.
Why is it chefen and not chef?
Because chefen is the definite form, meaning the boss / the manager.
In Swedish, nouns usually add a suffix to show definiteness:
- en chef = a boss / a manager
- chefen = the boss / the manager
So Chefen vill ... means The boss wants ...
Why is vill used here?
Vill is the present tense of vilja (to want).
A very common pattern in Swedish is:
- subject + vill + infinitive
So here:
- Chefen = the boss
- vill = wants
- avsluta = to end / to conclude
Together: Chefen vill avsluta ... = The boss wants to end ...
Why is there no word for to before avsluta?
Because after vill, Swedish normally uses the bare infinitive.
In English, we say:
- wants to end
But in Swedish, after modal-like verbs such as vill, you usually do not use att:
- vill avsluta = wants to end
Compare:
- Jag vill gå. = I want to go.
- Hon vill äta. = She wants to eat.
So avsluta is an infinitive, but it appears without att after vill.
What form is avsluta?
Avsluta is the infinitive form of the verb.
Its basic meaning is to finish, to end, to conclude. In this sentence, it means something like end or conclude.
A few related forms:
- att avsluta = to end
- avslutar = ends / is ending
- avslutade = ended
- avslutat = ended / finished (supine or participial use depending on context)
In the sentence, it stays in the infinitive because it follows vill.
Why is it mötet and not möte?
Because mötet is the definite form of möte, meaning the meeting.
This noun is an ett-word:
- ett möte = a meeting
- mötet = the meeting
So:
- avsluta mötet = end the meeting
This is a very common pattern in Swedish, where definiteness is usually shown at the end of the noun.
How do I know that möte is an ett word?
Unfortunately, in Swedish you often need to learn the gender together with the noun.
So it is best to memorize nouns like this:
- ett möte
- en chef
- en lunch or just lunch in many contexts
Then the definite forms become easier:
- ett möte → mötet
- en chef → chefen
A useful rule of thumb is: always learn a noun with en or ett, not by itself.
Why is före used here? Could innan also work?
Yes, innan could also work in many cases, but före is especially common before a noun phrase.
Here, lunch is a noun, so:
- före lunch = before lunch
A useful distinction:
- före often comes before a noun
- innan often introduces a clause or can also be used more generally
Examples:
- före lunch = before lunch
- innan vi äter lunch = before we eat lunch
So in this sentence, före is a very natural choice.
Why is there no article before lunch?
Because Swedish often uses certain time expressions without an article, especially for meals and general times of day.
So:
- före lunch = before lunch
- efter lunch = after lunch
This is similar to English, where we also usually say before lunch, not before the lunch.
If you were talking about a specific lunch in a special context, Swedish could use a definite form, but in ordinary everyday use, lunch without an article is completely natural here.
What is the word order in this sentence?
The basic word order is:
- Chefen = subject
- vill = finite verb
- avsluta mötet = infinitive verb phrase
- före lunch = time expression
So the structure is:
Subject + finite verb + infinitive + object + time phrase
This is very normal Swedish main-clause word order.
You can think of it as:
- The boss | wants | to end the meeting | before lunch
Could the sentence also be written with a different word order?
Yes. Swedish often moves time expressions to the front, but then the finite verb must stay in second position.
For example:
- Före lunch vill chefen avsluta mötet.
This still means the same thing, but the emphasis is a bit different: before lunch is highlighted more.
Notice what happens:
- first comes Före lunch
- then the finite verb vill
- then the subject chefen
This is a classic example of Swedish V2 word order in main clauses.
Is chef always translated as boss?
Not always. Chef can mean boss, manager, head, or chief, depending on context.
In everyday office language, chefen often means:
- the boss
- the manager
So while boss is a very natural translation here, the exact English word can vary depending on the situation.
Does avsluta mean exactly the same as sluta?
Not exactly.
- avsluta often means to end something, to conclude, to bring something to a close
- sluta can mean to stop or to finish
In this sentence, avsluta mötet is especially natural because it refers to bringing the meeting to an end.
Compare:
- Vi avslutar mötet nu. = We are ending the meeting now.
- Han slutade arbeta klockan fem. = He stopped working at five.
So avsluta is a very good choice when the object is something like a meeting, a conversation, a discussion, a course, or a process.
How would this sentence sound in a more formal or less formal style?
The sentence as given is already very natural and neutral.
- Chefen vill avsluta mötet före lunch. = neutral, standard Swedish
A slightly more formal tone might use a different verb depending on context, but this sentence is perfectly appropriate in both speech and writing.
In casual spoken Swedish, people might sometimes choose simpler wording depending on situation, but there is nothing unnatural or overly formal about this version.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SwedishMaster Swedish — from Chefen vill avsluta mötet före lunch to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions