Svenskan kan vara svår ibland, men kaffet hjälper.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Swedish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Swedish now

Questions & Answers about Svenskan kan vara svår ibland, men kaffet hjälper.

Why is it Svenskan (with -n) and not just Svenska?

In Swedish, svenska can be used as a noun meaning “Swedish (the language).” Adding the definite ending -n (svenskan) gives “the Swedish language” as a specific system. Both are possible, but they pattern a bit differently:

  • Svenskan kan vara svår. = “The Swedish language can be difficult.” Here svenskan is a common-gender noun, so the adjective is svår.
  • Svenska kan vara svårt. = “Swedish can be difficult.” Here svenska is used generically, and Swedish often uses a neuter predicate adjective (svårt) for general statements like this.

You can also say Svenska språket kan vara svårt, where språket is a neuter noun, so the adjective becomes svårt.

Why is the adjective svår and not svårt or svåra?

Predicate adjectives agree with the subject in gender/number (but not in definiteness):

  • Common-gender singular subject → svår: Svenskan är svår.
  • Neuter singular subject → svårt: Svenska språket är svårt. / Det är svårt.
  • Plural subject → svåra: Reglerna är svåra.

Note: In predicates, adjectives do not take the definite -a just because the noun is definite. So you say Boken är dyr, not “dyr(a).” Attributively, you would use svåra with a definite noun: den svåra grammatiken.

Why use kan vara instead of just är?
  • kan vara softens the claim and expresses possibility/habit: “can be (at times).”
  • är is more categorical: “is.”

All of these are idiomatic, with slight differences in emphasis:

  • Svenskan kan vara svår ibland.
  • Svenskan är ibland svår.
  • Ibland är svenskan svår.
Is the comma before men necessary?
Yes, it’s standard (and recommended) to put a comma before men when it introduces a new main clause: …, men kaffet hjälper. This mirrors English punctuation and is a common rule in Swedish: use a comma before adversative conjunctions like men when linking two independent clauses.
Can I move ibland to another position?

Yes. All are natural, with small differences in rhythm/emphasis:

  • Ibland kan svenskan vara svår, men kaffet hjälper. (Fronted adverb; remember Swedish V2 → the finite verb kan comes second.)
  • Svenskan kan ibland vara svår, men kaffet hjälper.
  • Svenskan kan vara svår ibland, men kaffet hjälper. (Neutral, very common)

Avoid forms like Svenskan kan vara ibland svår, which sounds odd.

Why is there no att between kan and vara?

Modal verbs in Swedish are followed directly by the infinitive without att:

  • kan vara, måste gå, ska göra, vill läsa, får komma, bör tänka, brukar dricka.

With non-modals, att is often used before an infinitive, e.g., försöker att förstå (though after some verbs att is optional or often omitted).

Why kaffet (the definite) instead of just kaffe?

Both can work, but they nuance the meaning:

  • Kaffet hjälper.

    • Often means “the coffee (I’m drinking / we have) helps,” or
    • A generic-definite reading: “coffee (as a category) helps.” Swedish frequently uses definite singular for generic statements.
  • Kaffe hjälper.

    • Treats coffee as a mass substance and sounds very general: “Coffee helps (in general).”

In everyday speech, Kaffet hjälper feels natural when you have a specific cup in mind; Kaffe hjälper is fine for a broad, generic claim.

Do I need an object after hjälper, or should it be hjälper till?
  • hjälper can stand alone: Kaffet hjälper.
  • With an object: Kaffet hjälper mig.
  • With an infinitive: Kaffet hjälper mig att fokusera.
  • hjälper med
    • noun: Kaffet hjälper med koncentrationen.
  • hjälper mot
    • problem/symptom: Kaffe hjälper mot trötthet.
  • hjälper till (att …) means “to assist, contribute (to doing something)”: Koffeinet hjälper till att väcka mig.

Don’t say hjälper till mig; use hjälper mig or hjälper till att …

What word-order rule puts kan right after Svenskan?
Swedish main clauses follow the V2 rule: the finite verb is in the second slot. Here, Svenskan occupies the first slot (topic), so the finite verb kan comes second: Svenskan kan vara … If you front an adverb, the verb still stays second: Ibland kan svenskan vara …
Is Svenskan capitalized because it’s a language name?
No. Swedish does not capitalise names of languages or nationalities. It’s capitalised here only because it starts the sentence. In the middle of a sentence you’d write svenskan.
Any pronunciation tips for this sentence?
  • hjälper: The h in hj is silent; it starts with a j-sound (like English “y”). ä is like the vowel in English “bed.”
  • svår: å is like the “aw” in “law,” usually long here. Clear r at the end.
  • kaffet: Double ff signals a short a. Pronounce the final -et as [e]-sound plus t.
  • Svenskan: Short e in svens-, short a in the last syllable.
  • ibland: The d is pronounced; i is like “ee.”
Could I shorten the second clause to … men det hjälper?
Yes. … men det hjälper is natural and means “but it helps,” where det refers to the previously mentioned coffee. You could also repeat the noun for clarity: … men kaffet hjälper.
Could I say Svenskan är svår ibland (without kan vara)?

Yes. Svenskan är svår ibland is perfectly idiomatic and a bit more matter-of-fact. Compare the shades of meaning:

  • Svenskan kan vara svår ibland = can be difficult (possibility/occasional difficulty).
  • Svenskan är svår ibland = is difficult sometimes (a firmer statement about recurring difficulty).