Breakdown of Barua iliyo mezani ni ya mwalimu.
Questions & Answers about Barua iliyo mezani ni ya mwalimu.
It introduces a relative clause meaning which/that is. It agrees with the noun class of barua (class 9).
Breakdown of iliyo:
- i-: subject marker for class 9 (agrees with barua)
- -li-: the stem used in these relative forms of kuwa (to be)
- -yo: class 9 relative ending
So barua iliyo mezani = the letter which is on the table.
Parallel examples with other classes:
- Class 1: mtu aliye hapa (the person who is here)
- Class 7: kitu kilicho mezani (the thing that is on the table)
- Class 10 plural: barua zilizo mezani (the letters that are on the table)
Yes. Two common equivalents are:
- Barua iliyo mezani ... (compact relative with the -o ending)
- Barua ambayo iko mezani ... (amba- relative + a full verb)
Both are correct. The -o form is shorter and very common in speech; the ambayo form is a bit heavier and can feel more formal or helpful in very long clauses.
All are possible, with nuance:
- iliyo mezani: perfectly normal; often used without adding -ko/-po.
- iliyoko mezani: explicitly “which is located on the table” (neutral/default location).
- iliyopo mezani: also “which is located on the table,” with a sense of a specific/definite spot.
- Use -mo (e.g., iliyomo) if something is inside a place.
You’ll hear all of these; adding -ko/-po/-mo just makes the locative sense explicit.
Not here. In these short relative forms of kuwa (to be) like aliye, iliyo, kilicho, the -li- is conventional and does not force a past meaning. If you really want to mark past, use:
- ambayo ilikuwa mezani or iliyokuwa mezani = which was on the table.
- meza = table
- mezani = at/on the table (meza + locative suffix -ni)
The locative -ni often covers at/in/on. For a more explicit “on top of,” use juu ya meza. You can also say kwenye meza for “on/at the table.”
Because the connective -a agrees with the possessed noun, not the possessor. The possessed item is barua (class 9), so you use the class 9 form ya:
- barua ya mwalimu = the teacher’s letter Compare:
- kitabu cha mwalimu (class 7: kitabu → cha)
- viti vya mwalimu (class 8: viti → vya)
The possessor (mwalimu) does not determine the form of -a.
Yes, ni is the copula meaning “is.” Without it, you’d just have a noun phrase, not a full sentence.
Negation:
- Barua iliyo mezani si ya mwalimu.
- You’ll also hear sio/siyo: … siyo ya mwalimu.
Past/future:
- … ilikuwa ya mwalimu (was)
- … itakuwa ya mwalimu (will be)
Use class 10 agreement for the relative and the connective:
- Barua zilizo mezani ni za mwalimu. Notes:
- barua is both singular and plural in form.
- Relative: zilizo (class 10)
- Connective: za (class 10)
In neutral style, the relative clause follows the noun it describes:
- Natural: Barua iliyo mezani ni ya mwalimu. Fronting it (e.g., Iliyo mezani barua…) is possible but marked/special. Keeping it right after barua is the safest and most natural.
No. ya mwalimu means “of/belonging to the teacher.” For “for the teacher,” use:
- kwa mwalimu or kwa ajili ya mwalimu (for the teacher/for the benefit of the teacher).
Yes. Use a possessive that agrees with barua (class 9):
- Barua iliyo mezani ni yake. = The letter … is his/hers. Other examples with class-9 agreement: yangu (mine), yetu (ours), yenu (yours pl.).
Yes. Both are grammatical but differ in focus:
- Barua iliyo mezani ni ya mwalimu. Focuses first on “the letter on the table,” then states it belongs to the teacher.
- Barua ya mwalimu iliyo mezani … Starts by identifying it as “the teacher’s letter,” then specifies which one (the one on the table).