En la receta nueva, la calabaza va en un recipiente aparte para que mantenga su textura cremosa.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Spanish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Spanish now

Questions & Answers about En la receta nueva, la calabaza va en un recipiente aparte para que mantenga su textura cremosa.

Why does the sentence use va en instead of something like está en or se pone en?

In recipes and instructions, Spanish often uses ir + en to express where something goes or belongs, not where it is at this exact moment.

  • La calabaza va en un recipiente aparte
    = The squash/pumpkin goes in a separate container (that’s its place in the process).

Compare:

  • La calabaza está en un recipiente aparte
    = The squash is in a separate container (describing its current location, not an instruction).

  • La calabaza se pone en un recipiente aparte
    = The squash is put in a separate container (more like describing the action; also acceptable in a recipe).

All of these can be correct, but va en is very natural in cooking instructions when explaining where each ingredient should go.

Why is it la calabaza and not just calabaza without the article?

Spanish uses definite articles (el, la, los, las) more often than English, especially when referring to things in a specific situation.

Here, la calabaza means the squash/the pumpkin ingredient that the recipe is already talking about. It’s similar to saying:

  • In the new recipe, *the squash goes in a separate container…*

If you said just calabaza va en un recipiente aparte, it would sound incomplete or unnatural in standard Spanish.

In recipes you might see both styles:

  • Añade la calabaza. – Add the squash.
  • Añadir calabaza. – (Telegraphic style, like a note or step title.)

But in a full sentence like this one, you normally keep the article: la calabaza.

Why is calabaza feminine (la calabaza)?

The noun calabaza is grammatically feminine in Spanish, so it takes la and una:

  • la calabaza, una calabaza, esta calabaza.

There isn’t a logical gender reason; it’s just how the word is defined in the language.

Note for Latin America:

  • In many countries, people also say el zapallo (masculine) for some types of squash/pumpkin.
  • You might hear phrases like:
    • La calabaza va en un recipiente aparte.
    • El zapallo va en un recipiente aparte.

Both are correct; they’re just different words, with different grammatical gender.

What is the difference between la receta nueva and la nueva receta?

Word order with adjectives can slightly change the nuance:

  • la receta nueva
    Tends to mean the recipe that is new (recent, just created or discovered). The focus is on newness in time.

  • la nueva receta
    Often sounds a bit more like the new recipe (as opposed to an old/previous one); a bit more contrastive, like this new version or this other recipe we now have.

In many contexts, they overlap and both just mean the new recipe. In your sentence, En la receta nueva and En la nueva receta would both be understood and natural. This is a subtle nuance, not a strict rule.

What does aparte mean here? Is it different from separado or por separado?

In this sentence, aparte means separately / in a separate place.

  • La calabaza va en un recipiente aparte
    = The squash goes in a separate container.

Possible alternatives:

  • …en un recipiente separado – in a separate container (more explicitly adjectival).
  • …en un recipiente, por separado – in a container, separately.

All are understandable, but:

  • aparte is short and very common in recipes and everyday speech.
  • It functions a bit like an adverb: poner algo aparte = put something aside / separately.
Why is it para que mantenga and not para que mantiene?

After para que, Spanish requires the subjunctive, not the indicative.

  • para que = so that / in order that
  • It introduces a purpose or goal.

So you must say:

  • para que mantenga (subjunctive)
    not para que mantiene (indicative; ungrammatical here).

The structure is:

  • para que
    • verb in the subjunctive.

Here mantenga is the present subjunctive of mantener (3rd person singular).

Why is mantenga in the subjunctive, and how is it formed?

Mantenga is present subjunctive, 3rd person singular, of mantener.

You use the subjunctive because:

  • The clause para que mantenga su textura cremosa expresses a purpose (what you want to happen), not a fact that is already true.
  • Purpose clauses with para que almost always take the subjunctive.

Formation:

  1. Start from mantener.
  2. The present indicative yo form is mantengo.
  3. Remove the -o: manteng-.
  4. Add present subjunctive endings for -er verbs:

    • yo mantenga
    • tú mantengas
    • él/ella/usted mantenga
    • nosotros mantengamos
    • vosotros mantengáis (mainly Spain)
    • ellos/ustedes mantengan

Here we need ella mantenga (referring to la calabaza), so the form is mantenga.

Could we say para mantener su textura cremosa instead of para que mantenga su textura cremosa?

Yes, that’s possible, and both are correct, but there is a small nuance:

  • para que mantenga su textura cremosa
    Literally: so that it keeps its creamy texture.
    Focuses on the squash doing the maintaining (subject = la calabaza).

  • para mantener su textura cremosa
    Literally: to keep its creamy texture.
    More abstract and impersonal, focusing on the goal of the action, not on who/what keeps it.

In practice, both sound natural in a recipe. The original sentence with para que mantenga is slightly more explicit about la calabaza being the thing that keeps its texture.

What exactly does su refer to in su textura cremosa? Could it be ambiguous?

In this sentence, su refers to la calabaza:

  • su textura cremosa = its creamy texture = the squash’s creamy texture.

Grammatically, su could refer to other singular nouns mentioned earlier (like receta or recipiente), but world knowledge and meaning make it clear:

  • Recipes don’t usually talk about a creamy texture of the recipe or of the container.
  • They often talk about the texture of the ingredient.

So in real use, it’s not confusing.

If someone wanted to make it absolutely explicit (and a bit more formal), they could say:

  • …para que la calabaza mantenga su textura cremosa.

But normally it’s understood without repeating la calabaza.

Why is it un recipiente (masculine) and not una recipiente?

Recipiente is a masculine noun in Spanish, so it takes un / el / este:

  • un recipiente, el recipiente, este recipiente.

The fact that the word ends in -e doesn’t tell you its gender; many -e words are masculine (el puente, el aire, el cliente), and many are feminine (la gente, la noche). You just have to learn recipiente as masculine.

Why is the order textura cremosa (noun + adjective) and not cremosa textura?

In Spanish, the default order is:

  • noun + adjective

So:

  • textura cremosa = creamy texture.

You could say cremosa textura, but:

  • It sounds literary, poetic, or very stylistic, not like normal recipe language.
  • In everyday speech and writing, textura cremosa is the natural order.

So the basic rule to remember:

  • English: adjective + nouncreamy texture
  • Spanish: noun + adjectivetextura cremosa