Log inSign up

В начинке была корица, и булочка пахла очень вкусно.

В начинке была корица, и булочка пахла очень вкусно.
There was cinnamon in the filling, and the bun smelled very tasty.

Breakdown of В начинке была корица, и булочка пахла очень вкусно.

в
in
быть
to be
и
and
очень
very
пахнуть
to smell
булочка
the bun
начинка
the filling
корица
the cinnamon
вкусно
tasty
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about В начинке была корица, и булочка пахла очень вкусно.

Why is it в начинке and not в начинка?

Because в (meaning in) requires the prepositional case when it refers to location.
So начинка → в начинке (in the filling).

Why does it say была? What determines that form?

Была is the past tense form of быть (to be) that agrees with a feminine singular subject.
The subject here is корица (cinnamon), which is feminine singular, so you get:

  • корица была = cinnamon was
Why is the word order В начинке была корица instead of Корица была в начинке?

Both are grammatically correct, but the word order changes the information focus:

  • В начинке была корица highlights what was in the filling (new info = корица).
  • Корица была в начинке highlights where the cinnamon was (new info = в начинке).

Russian word order is flexible and often used for emphasis.

Can была be omitted here?

Usually in the present tense, быть is omitted (e.g., В начинке корица is possible in some styles).
But in the past tense, you normally must use it:

  • ✅ В начинке была корица.
  • ❌ В начинке корица. (sounds incomplete/telegraphic unless in notes/headlines)
Why is there a comma before и?

Because и connects two independent clauses (each could be a full sentence): 1) В начинке была корица.
2) Булочка пахла очень вкусно.
So Russian typically uses a comma: ..., и ...

Why is it булочка пахла, not пахнулa?

The verb is пахнуть (imperfective), describing a general/ongoing smell. In past tense, feminine singular:

  • булочка (feminine) → пахла

Пахнула exists but usually implies a more momentary/brief “gave off a smell” sense and is less neutral here.

Why does it say пахла очень вкусно (“smelled very delicious”)—is that natural in Russian?

Yes, Russian often uses вкусно (tasty/delicious) to describe how something smells, meaning “it smelled appetizing / smelled really good.”
So пахла очень вкусно is a normal, natural phrasing.

Why is вкусно an adverb, not an adjective like вкусная?

Because it describes how it smelled (the action/state of smelling), not the bun itself as a noun description.

  • булочка вкусная = the bun is tasty (adjective describing the noun)
  • булочка пахла вкусно = the bun smelled tasty (adverb describing the verb)
Could it also be булочка пахла корицей? What’s the difference?

Yes. Пахла корицей uses the instrumental case (корицей) to mean “smelled of cinnamon” (identifying the smell source).
Compare:

  • пахла корицей = smelled like/of cinnamon (what it smelled of)
  • пахла вкусно = smelled delicious (evaluation of the smell)

You can even combine them:

  • булочка пахла корицей и очень вкусно (a bit heavy stylistically)
    More natural: булочка пахла корицей и выглядела очень аппетитно.
Is очень the only option? Are there common alternatives?

Очень is the most neutral very. Common alternatives include:

  • пахла просто вкусно = smelled simply/just delicious
  • пахла невероятно вкусно = smelled unbelievably delicious
  • пахла так вкусно = smelled so delicious
  • пахла безумно вкусно = smelled crazily delicious (colloquial)