Log inSign up

На шоссе стоит ехать медленнее, когда идёт дождь.

На шоссе стоит ехать медленнее, когда идёт дождь.
On the highway it’s worth driving more slowly when it is raining.

Breakdown of На шоссе стоит ехать медленнее, когда идёт дождь.

на
on
когда
when
ехать
to drive
идти
to rain
медленнее
more slowly
стоить
to be worth
шоссе
highway
дождь
rain
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about На шоссе стоит ехать медленнее, когда идёт дождь.

Why is стоит used here—doesn’t it mean to cost?

Yes, стоить can mean to cost, but it also has a common modal-like meaning: it’s worth / it’s advisable / you should (mild recommendation).

  • Стоит + infinitive = “it’s worth doing / you should do” So На шоссе стоит ехать медленнее... means “On the highway, you should drive more slowly...”, not “it costs to drive...”.
Why is there no subject like ты/вы/мы? Who “should” drive more slowly?

This is an impersonal construction. Russian often leaves the subject generic/unspecified when giving general advice.

  • Literally: “On the highway, it’s advisable to drive more slowly when it’s raining.” It applies to anyone driving (a general rule), not a specific person.
Why is it стоит ехать (infinitive) and not something like стоит едешь?

After стоит in this meaning, Russian normally uses the infinitive:

  • стоит сделать, стоит поехать, стоит ехать
    Using a finite verb (едешь/едете) would not work in this pattern.
What’s the difference between ехать and ездить here? Could it be стоит ездить медленнее?

ехать = to go/drive in one конкретная поездка / at a particular time (a single trip or current motion).
ездить = to go/drive habitually / repeatedly. Because the sentence describes what to do in the situation “when it’s raining”, ехать is the natural default.
ездить is possible, but it shifts the meaning toward a general habit: “It’s worth driving more slowly (as a rule) when it rains.”

Why is it медленнее and not медленно?

медленнее is the comparative: “slower / more slowly.” It implies “slower than normal / than you otherwise would.” If you say ехать медленно, that’s simply “to drive slowly” (no comparison implied).

Why is На шоссе used, and what case is шоссе in?

На шоссе uses на + prepositional case to mean “on/along the highway.”

  • шоссе is indeclinable (it looks the same in many cases), so you don’t see a different ending. This phrase sets the location/context: “On the highway...”
Could it be по шоссе instead of на шоссе?

Yes, often both are possible, with a slight nuance:

  • на шоссе = emphasizing being on the highway (as a place/setting)
  • по шоссе = emphasizing movement along the highway In many real sentences, they can be close in meaning, and both sound natural.
Why is когда used, and why is there a comma before it?

когда introduces a subordinate time clause: “when...” Russian normally separates subordinate clauses with a comma:

  • стоит ехать медленнее, когда идёт дождь. So the comma is standard punctuation marking the dependent clause.
Why does Russian say идёт дождь (“rain goes”)? Why not a verb meaning “to rain”?

Russian commonly describes weather with an impersonal pattern:

  • идёт дождь / идёт снег = “it’s raining / it’s snowing” There is also дождит, but it’s much less common and can sound more colloquial or regional. Идёт дождь is the neutral, standard choice.
What aspect/tense is идёт, and what does it imply?

идёт is present tense, imperfective of идти. In weather expressions, imperfective present usually means the action is currently happening or is true during that time window:

  • “when it is raining / when rain is falling.”
Is the word order fixed? Could it be Когда идёт дождь, на шоссе стоит ехать медленнее?

Yes, that word order is also correct. You can move the когда-clause to the front:

  • Когда идёт дождь, на шоссе стоит ехать медленнее. Meaning stays essentially the same; fronting the clause can make the “when it’s raining” condition feel more prominent.
How strong is стоит compared to нужно / следует?

They differ in force:

  • стоит = mild recommendation: “it’s worth / you should (probably)”
  • следует = more formal/official recommendation: “one should / it is advisable”
  • нужно = stronger necessity: “need to / must” So стоит ехать медленнее sounds like sensible advice rather than a strict rule.