Log inSign up

O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.

O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.
Pedro is going to wear the suit for the wedding.

Breakdown of O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.

Pedro
Pedro
ir
to go
para
for
o casamento
the wedding
vestir
to wear
o fato
the suit
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Portuguese grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Portuguese now

Questions & Answers about O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.

Why is there an “O” before the name “Pedro”? In English we don’t say “The Peter”.

In European Portuguese, it’s very common to use the definite article (o / a) before people’s names:

  • O Pedro – Pedro
  • A Ana – Ana

This doesn’t usually add any special meaning; it’s just the normal, neutral way many speakers refer to people.

You can sometimes drop the article (just Pedro) in more formal contexts or in writing, but in everyday speech O Pedro is completely standard in Portugal.

Could the sentence be “Pedro vai vestir o fato…” without the “O”?

Yes, you can say:

  • Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.

It’s grammatically correct, and you’ll see this more in:

  • headlines
  • formal writing
  • some regional or personal styles

However, in ordinary spoken European Portuguese, O Pedro is more natural. Dropping the article is much more typical of Brazilian Portuguese or of more formal styles in Portugal.

Why is it “vai vestir” and not just “veste”? What’s the difference?
  • Vai vestir = is going to put on / will put on (near future)
  • Veste = puts on / wears (present tense, more general or habitual)

So:

  • O Pedro veste o fato.
    → Pedro wears the suit / puts the suit on (could be a habit or something happening now, but in isolation it often sounds more like a description).

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato.
    → Pedro is going to put the suit on (future action, often fairly soon, or part of plans).

In conversation, Portuguese speakers very often use ir + infinitive (vai vestir) to talk about the future, just like English uses “going to”.

Could I say “O Pedro vestirá o fato” instead of “vai vestir o fato”?

Grammatically, yes:

  • O Pedro vestirá o fato para o casamento.

This uses the simple future (vestirá). However:

  • In modern spoken Portuguese (especially in Portugal), ir + infinitive (vai vestir) is much more common and sounds more natural in everyday speech.
  • Vestirá tends to sound:
    • more formal
    • more written than spoken
    • a bit distant or literary in many contexts

So for normal conversation, O Pedro vai vestir o fato… is the better choice.

Should it be “vai vestir-se” instead of “vai vestir”? When do I use the reflexive form?

Both forms exist, but they’re used differently:

  1. Vestir-se = to get dressed (in general)

    • O Pedro vai vestir-se.
      → Pedro is going to get dressed (we don’t say what exactly).

  2. Vestir + object = to put on / dress (someone in) a specific item

    • O Pedro vai vestir o fato.
      → Pedro is going to put on the suit.

So:

  • If you’re talking about getting dressed in general, use vestir-se.
  • If you’re talking about a specific piece of clothing, use vestir
    • that clothing item.

You could say O Pedro vai vestir-se com o fato, but that sounds less natural; the normal way is just vai vestir o fato.

What exactly does “fato” mean here? Doesn’t “fato” mean “fact”?

This is a key European vs Brazilian Portuguese difference.

In European Portuguese (Portugal):

  • o fato = the suit (jacket + trousers, often formal)
  • o facto (with c) = the fact

In Brazilian Portuguese:

  • o fato = the fact (they spell it without c)
  • o terno = the suit

So in Portugal:

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato.
    → Pedro is going to put on the suit.

If you write fato here, it’s understood as clothing, not as fact, because that meaning is spelled facto in Portugal. Context and spelling distinguish them.

Why is it “o fato” and not “um fato”? What’s the difference?
  • O fato = the suit (a specific suit that both speaker and listener can identify)
  • Um fato = a suit (any suit; not specific)

In this sentence, o fato suggests:

  • “the suit (he has for this kind of event / the one we already know about).”

Compare:

  • O Pedro vai vestir um fato para o casamento.
    → Pedro is going to put on a suit for the wedding (just mentioning the type of clothing, not a particular one you both have in mind).

In many real situations, people assume there is a specific suit chosen for the wedding, so o fato sounds natural.

Why is it “para o casamento” and not just “para casamento”?
  • para o casamento = for the wedding, a specific wedding (the one we’re talking about)
  • para casamento, without the article, would sound odd here in European Portuguese.

In Portuguese, you normally keep the article when you mean a specific event:

  • para o jantar – for the dinner
  • para a reunião – for the meeting
  • para o casamento – for the wedding

Dropping the article is less common and usually sounds unnatural in this exact context.

Could I say “no casamento” instead of “para o casamento”? What’s the difference in meaning?

Yes, but the meaning changes:

  • para o casamento
    → for the wedding, expressing purpose:
    He will put the suit on in order to be dressed appropriately for the wedding.

  • no casamento ( = em + o casamento)
    → at the wedding, expressing place/time:
    He will put the suit on at the wedding (during the wedding event).

So:

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.
    → The suit is for that occasion.

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato no casamento.
    → He’s going to put the suit on at the wedding (maybe implying he changes there).

In most cases, people mean purpose, so para o casamento is the natural choice.

Why is it “para o” and not a single contracted word, like in some other prepositions?

Some prepositions do contract with articles:

  • de + o → do
  • em + o → no
  • a + o → ao

But para is different:

  • para + o → para o (no contraction in standard Portuguese)
  • para + a → para a

In spoken language, you’ll hear contracted forms:

  • pr’ó casamento (from para o casamento)
  • pr’a festa (from para a festa)

However, in standard writing you should keep para o, as in your sentence.

Can I change the word order, like “O Pedro o fato vai vestir para o casamento”?

In everyday Portuguese, you should keep Subject – Verb – Object:

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.

Sentences like:

  • O Pedro o fato vai vestir…

sound unnatural or very marked/poetic. Word order can be changed for emphasis in Portuguese, but it’s limited and usually more advanced. For normal communication, don’t move o fato away from vai vestir in this kind of sentence.

Could I say “O Pedro vai usar o fato para o casamento” instead of “vai vestir”?

Yes, but the meaning is slightly different:

  • vestir o fato = to put the suit on (the action of dressing)
  • usar o fato = to wear the suit (having it on during the event)

So:

  • O Pedro vai vestir o fato para o casamento.
    → Focus on getting dressed / putting it on for the wedding.

  • O Pedro vai usar o fato no casamento.
    → Focus on wearing it during the wedding.

Both are correct; they just highlight different parts of the situation.

Why do we say “O Pedro” and not use a pronoun like “Ele”?

You can say:

  • Ele vai vestir o fato para o casamento.
    → He is going to put on the suit for the wedding.

The choice depends on context:

  • If Pedro has not yet been mentioned, you normally introduce him by name:
    O Pedro vai vestir o fato…
  • If it’s already clear who you’re talking about, you can switch to the pronoun:
    Ele vai vestir o fato…

Also, in Portuguese you often omit subject pronouns when the verb ending makes it clear who the subject is:

  • Vai vestir o fato para o casamento.
    → (He) is going to put on the suit for the wedding.

In context, this would usually be understood as He (or she, etc.) from whatever was said before.