Depois, misturo tudo na tigela com limão e mel.

Misturo is the 1st person singular present indicative form of the verb misturar (to mix).

• misturar = the infinitive, to mix
• misturo = I mix
• mistura can mean he/she mixes, or it can be an imperative form in some contexts

So this sentence is literally Then, I mix everything...

This sounds like the speaker is describing what they do, not directly giving an instruction to someone else. In a recipe addressed to the reader, you might also see forms like:

• Mistura tudo... = Mix everything... (informal singular)
• Misture tudo... = Mix everything... (formal singular)

Portuguese often drops subject pronouns when they are not needed, because the verb ending already shows who is doing the action.

Here, misturo already clearly means I mix, so eu is unnecessary.

• Misturo tudo... = normal, natural
• Eu misturo tudo... = also correct, but adds emphasis or contrast

For example, you might say Eu misturo tudo, e tu cortas a fruta if you want to contrast I and you.

Depois means afterwards, then, or later.

At the start of a sentence, it works as a sequence marker, showing the next step in a process:

• Depois, misturo tudo... = Then, I mix everything...

The comma is very common when depois comes at the beginning like this, especially in written instructions or narration. It helps separate the time word from the main clause.

You may also see sentences without the comma in informal writing, but the version with the comma is perfectly natural.

Tudo means everything. It is a pronoun standing on its own.

• misturo tudo = I mix everything

Todo, on the other hand, usually means all or every, and it normally goes with a noun:

• todo o sumo = all the juice
• toda a massa = all the dough
• todos os ingredientes = all the ingredients

So:

• tudo = everything
• todo/toda/todos/todas = all/every
  • noun

Because na is a contraction:

• em
  • a = na

So:

• na tigela literally comes from em a tigela
• it means in the bowl

This kind of contraction is extremely common in Portuguese:

• no = em + o
• na = em + a
• nos = em + os
• nas = em + as

So na tigela is just the normal way to say in the bowl.

The difference is about specificity.

• na tigela = in the bowl → a specific bowl, one already known from context
• numa tigela = in a bowl → any bowl, not a specific one

So the sentence as written suggests there is a particular bowl already understood in the situation.

Compare:

• Misturo tudo na tigela. = I mix everything in the bowl.
• Misturo tudo numa tigela. = I mix everything in a bowl.

Both are correct; they just mean slightly different things.

In Portuguese, when talking about ingredients, substances, or things in a general way, it is very common to leave out the article.

So:

• com limão e mel = with lemon and honey

This sounds natural when you mean the ingredients generally.

If you were referring to specific lemon and honey already mentioned, you could say:

• com o limão e o mel

That would sound more like with the lemon and the honey.

So the sentence without articles is the natural choice for a general recipe-style meaning.

This is a very good question, because in isolation the phrase can feel a little structurally ambiguous.

The most likely intended meaning is:

• I mix everything in the bowl, using/adding lemon and honey

But strictly speaking, na tigela com limão e mel could also be read as in the bowl with lemon and honey, where with lemon and honey describes the bowl's contents.

Usually, context makes this clear, especially in a recipe.

If you wanted to make it clearer, you could rephrase:

• Depois, misturo tudo na tigela e junto limão e mel.
• Depois, misturo tudo com limão e mel na tigela.
• Depois, na tigela, misturo tudo com limão e mel.

So the original sentence is natural, but context matters.

Portuguese word order is fairly flexible, although some versions sound more natural than others.

The original:

• Depois, misturo tudo na tigela com limão e mel.

is completely natural.

You can move parts of the sentence for emphasis or clarity, for example:

• Depois, na tigela, misturo tudo com limão e mel.
• Misturo tudo na tigela com limão e mel depois.
  This is grammatically possible, but less natural if depois is just introducing the next step.

In general:

• putting depois first is very common in instructions or narration
• moving na tigela can help clarity
• moving com limão e mel can change what feels emphasized

A rough European Portuguese pronunciation is:

Depois, misturo tudo na tigela com limão e mel.

Approximate guide for an English speaker:

• Depois ≈ duh-POYSH
• misturo ≈ meesh-TOO-roo
• tudo ≈ TOO-dhoo
• na tigela ≈ nuh tee-ZHEL-uh
• com limão e mel ≈ kong lee-MOWN ee MEL

A few useful pronunciation notes for Portugal Portuguese:

• final s in depois sounds like sh
• ti in tigela sounds like tee, not tchi
• j in tigela sounds like the s in measure
• ão in limão is nasal, which English does not really have
• the r in misturo is a tapped Portuguese r, not a heavy English r

If you want a more IPA-style version, it is approximately:

/dɨˈpojʃ miʃˈtuɾu ˈtuðu nɐ tiˈʒɛlɐ kõ liˈmɐ̃w i mɛl/

Yes. Tigela is a normal and common word in European Portuguese for a bowl, especially a kitchen bowl or serving bowl.

Depending on context, you may also hear other words, but tigela is absolutely standard and natural here.

So for Portugal Portuguese, na tigela is a very normal phrase.