É mentira que a loja fica longe; na verdade, ela está próxima.

to be

Breakdown of É mentira que a loja fica longe; na verdade, ela está próxima.

• estar: to be
• em: in
• longe: far
• que: that
• a mentira: the lie
• a loja: the store
• a verdade: the truth
• próximo: near

Questions & Answers about É mentira que a loja fica longe; na verdade, ela está próxima.

Why do we say é mentira (it’s a lie) instead of simply saying não é verdade (it’s not true)?

Both expressions convey that something is untrue, but é mentira is often used to more directly emphasize the falsehood. Não é verdade could sound more neutral or polite, while é mentira can sound stronger or more categorical in claiming something is false.

What is the difference between fica and está when talking about location?

In Portuguese, ficar is commonly used to describe where something is located in a more or less permanent sense (e.g., “A loja fica na rua principal” – The store is on the main street). Está can also mean a temporary state or location, or just state a position (e.g., “Ela está próxima” – It is nearby). In everyday speech, there’s some overlap, so both can sometimes be interchangeable, but ficar is more specifically about location, while estar can be broader, including states or conditions.

Why do we use próxima here instead of perto?

Próxima is an adjective agreeing with ela (in this case, referring to a loja), meaning “near” or “close by.” If you wanted to use perto, you would say something like “Ela está perto,” which works too, but próxima directly describes a loja as being near. In short, próxima (feminine) is used like an adjective, whereas perto functions more like an adverb or preposition.

How does the semicolon (;) function in the sentence É mentira que a loja fica longe; na verdade, ela está próxima?

In Portuguese, as in English, a semicolon can join two closely related main clauses. Here, it separates the statement É mentira que a loja fica longe from the contrasting statement na verdade, ela está próxima, showing that the second clause is related but provides a contradictory or opposing idea to the first.

Could I replace na verdade with other phrases, like de fato or na realidade?

Yes, expressions like de fato, na realidade, or even na verdade all introduce a clarifying or corrective statement. The meaning would remain generally the same, though there can be slight nuances in tone. For example, de fato is “in fact,” and na realidade is “in reality,” but all serve the function of emphasizing the actual truth that something is nearby, not far away.