Sprawdź zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności, zanim zakwestionujesz odmowę wypłaty.

Sprawdź is the imperative form of sprawdzić = to check / verify.

In this sentence it means check.

A few useful points:

• it is addressed to one person
• it is the informal singular form, used with ty
• it comes from the perfective verb sprawdzić, so it suggests checking something as a complete action

So Sprawdź... is basically Check... or Make sure you check...

They are in the accusative case, because they are direct objects of sprawdź.

But in Polish, some nouns look the same in the nominative and accusative:

• zakres is a masculine inanimate noun, so its accusative singular is the same as its nominative singular
• wyłączenie is a neuter noun, and neuter nominative and accusative singular are also the same

So:

• zakres = nominative or accusative
• wyłączenie = nominative or accusative

That is why they look unchanged.

These are in the genitive case, because Polish often expresses noun + of + noun by using the second noun in the genitive.

So:

• zakres ochrony = scope of protection / coverage
• wyłączenie odpowiedzialności = exclusion of liability / disclaimer of liability

This structure is very common in Polish:

• numer telefonu = phone number
• koniec roku = end of the year
• zakres ochrony = scope of protection

So ochrony and odpowiedzialności mean of protection and of liability/responsibility.

Literally, it means exclusion of liability/responsibility.

In legal or insurance language, it usually refers to a clause saying that someone:

• is not liable in certain situations, or
• that certain situations are excluded from coverage

Depending on context, English translations might include:

• exclusion of liability
• liability exclusion
• disclaimer
• exclusion clause

In an insurance context, it often means something like the situations in which the insurer will not pay.

Zakwestionujesz is:

• 2nd person singular
• from the verb zakwestionować = to challenge / contest / question
• perfective

Formally, it is a present-tense form, but because the verb is perfective, it refers to a future completed action.

So in practice it means:

• you will challenge
• or, after zanim, before you challenge

This is a very important Polish pattern: perfective present forms often have future meaning.

Because zanim means before, and it introduces a subordinate clause, not another command.

So the structure is:

• main command: Sprawdź... = Check...
• time clause: zanim zakwestionujesz... = before you challenge...

Polish normally uses a regular finite verb after zanim, not the imperative.

So:

• Sprawdź..., zanim zakwestionujesz... = correct
• Sprawdź..., zanim zakwestionuj... = not natural/correct here

• odmowę is the accusative singular of odmowa = refusal / denial
• wypłaty is the genitive singular of wypłata = payment / payout / disbursement

Why?

• odmowę is the direct object of zakwestionujesz
• wypłaty depends on odmowa, giving refusal of payment / denial of payout

So:

• zakwestionujesz odmowę = you challenge the refusal
• odmowę wypłaty = the refusal of payment / denial of payout

In general, wypłata means payment, payout, or disbursement.

But in this sentence, because of the insurance/legal vocabulary around it, it most likely means:

• an insurance payout
• a claim payment
• money that should be paid out under a policy

So odmowa wypłaty is likely:

• denial of payout
• refusal to pay the claim
• refusal of payment

The exact English wording depends on the broader context.

Yes. The sentence is addressed to one person informally (ty).

That is why we have:

• sprawdź
• zakwestionujesz

Some alternatives:

• informal singular:
  Sprawdź zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności, zanim zakwestionujesz odmowę wypłaty.

• informal plural:
  Sprawdźcie zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności, zanim zakwestionujecie odmowę wypłaty.

• formal singular (more natural):
  Proszę sprawdzić zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności, zanim zakwestionuje Pan/Pani odmowę wypłaty.

Polish usually avoids a direct imperative like sprawdź with Pan/Pani. Instead, proszę + infinitive is more natural.

Because zanim introduces a subordinate clause.

Polish normally separates the main clause and subordinate clause with a comma:

• Sprawdź zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności, zanim zakwestionujesz odmowę wypłaty.

This is similar to English punctuation in many sentences with subordinate clauses, though Polish is often stricter about using the comma.

Yes. Polish word order is fairly flexible.

For example, you could also say:

Zanim zakwestionujesz odmowę wypłaty, sprawdź zakres ochrony i wyłączenie odpowiedzialności.

This means the same thing:

• Before you challenge the denial of payout, check the scope of coverage and the exclusion of liability.

The difference is mainly emphasis:

• starting with Sprawdź... puts the command first
• starting with Zanim... emphasizes the time relation first

Both are natural.

Because the sentence refers to single, complete actions:

• sprawdzić = to check and complete the checking
• zakwestionować = to challenge/contest as a complete act

That fits the meaning well:

1. first, check the relevant parts
2. then, if needed, challenge the refusal

If imperfective verbs were used, the meaning would change:

• sprawdzaj would sound more like keep checking / check habitually
• kwestionować would sound more process-oriented or repeated

So the perfective aspect is the natural choice for a one-time instruction like this.

Yes. I here simply joins two direct objects:

• zakres ochrony
• wyłączenie odpowiedzialności

So the structure is:

Sprawdź [zakres ochrony] i [wyłączenie odpowiedzialności]...

= Check [the scope of coverage] and [the exclusion of liability]...

There is nothing unusual about i here; it is the standard Polish word for and.