Log inSign up

Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen, så jeg mister den ikke.

Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen, så jeg mister den ikke.
The scissors are lying next to the tape, so I don’t lose them.

Breakdown of Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen, så jeg mister den ikke.

jeg
I
den
it
ikke
not
så
so
miste
to lose
ligge
to lie
ved siden av
next to
teipen
the tape
saksen
the scissors
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Norwegian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Norwegian now

Questions & Answers about Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen, så jeg mister den ikke.

Why does it say saksen and not just saks?

Saksen is the definite form (“the scissors”). In Norwegian, you very often use the definite form when you’re talking about a specific, known object in the situation.

  • Indefinite: (en) saks = “a pair of scissors / a scissors (tool)”
  • Definite: saksen = “the scissors (we’re talking about)”

Also, unlike English scissors (which is plural), Norwegian saks is typically treated as a singular noun.

Is saks really singular in Norwegian, even though it’s “scissors” in English?

Yes. Norwegian commonly treats it as singular:

  • Saksen ligger … (singular verb ligger) You can also encounter plural-like forms in some varieties (e.g., saksa), but the standard/common everyday form is singular saksen when referring to one tool.
Why is teipen also definite?

Same idea: teipen is “the tape” (a particular tape you both know about / can see).

  • Indefinite: (en) teip = “a tape / some tape”
  • Definite: teipen = “the tape”

Norwegian often “bundles” the meaning of “that specific one” into the noun ending, rather than using the as a separate word.

What’s the dictionary form and gender of these nouns?

Typical dictionary entries would be:

  • en saks – saksen (common gender)
  • en teip – teipen (common gender)

So the definite ending -en matches common gender nouns.

Why use ligger here instead of er (is)?

Norwegian often prefers position verbs:

  • ligge (lie), stå (stand), sitte (sit) instead of a plain “to be” when describing where something is physically located.

So Saksen ligger … sounds natural for an object resting somewhere. Saksen er ved siden av teipen is possible, but often feels more neutral/less descriptive.

How does ved siden av work? Is it one preposition?

Functionally, yes: ved siden av is a fixed prepositional expression meaning “next to / beside.”

  • ved = “by/at”
  • siden = “the side”
  • av = “of”

You treat it as a chunk: ved siden av + noun → ved siden av teipen.

What does så do here, grammatically?

Here så means “so” and links two main clauses (it works like a coordinating conjunction):

  • Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen,
  • så jeg mister den ikke.

It’s basically “X, so Y.”

Could I also say …, så mister jeg den ikke?

Yes, and it’s common. But it can feel slightly different depending on context:

  • …, så jeg mister den ikke. = “…, so I don’t lose it.” (straightforward “result”)
  • …, så mister jeg den ikke. = often sounds like “…, then I won’t lose it / and then I don’t lose it,” because starting the clause with så can also have a “then” flavor and triggers inversion (mister jeg).

Both are understandable; the original is very natural.

Why is it jeg mister den ikke and not jeg ikke mister den?

Because this is a main clause, Norwegian uses V2 word order: the finite verb comes second.

  • Subject first (jeg) → verb second (mister) → then the rest. So jeg mister … is required in a normal main clause.

jeg ikke mister den would be a word order you’d expect in certain subordinate clause contexts (after at, fordi, etc.), not here.

Why is the negation ikke placed at the end: mister den ikke?

Norwegian typically places ikke after the verb, but its exact position depends on what comes after the verb. A common pattern:

  • If the object is a pronoun, it usually comes before ikke:
    Jeg mister den ikke.
  • If the object is a full noun phrase, ikke often comes before it:
    Jeg mister ikke saksen.

So den (a pronoun) “pulls forward” ahead of ikke.

What does den refer to, and why is it den?

den refers back to a singular common-gender noun—here, most naturally saksen (the scissors tool).

  • Common gender singular → den
  • Neuter singular would be det
  • Plural would be dem (or de in some contexts)

So jeg mister den ikke = “I won’t lose it.”

Why is there a comma before så?

Because you have two main clauses joined by så: 1) Saksen ligger ved siden av teipen 2) jeg mister den ikke

In Norwegian, it’s standard to use a comma between main clauses when they’re linked like this, especially in writing.