Breakdown of Jeg har en ny sykkel, og jeg sykler til parken i dag.
jeg
I
ha
to have
en
a
i dag
today
til
to
og
and
ny
new
sykkelen
the bicycle
sykle
to cycle
parken
the park
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Norwegian grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Jeg har en ny sykkel, og jeg sykler til parken i dag.
Why do we use en before ny sykkel?
Because sykkel is a common (masculine/feminine) gender noun and takes the indefinite article en in singular. Only neuter nouns use et.
Why is the adjective ny not nytt?
In Norwegian, adjectives agree with the noun's gender and number in the indefinite form. Since sykkel is common gender, the weak form of the adjective is ny. A neuter noun would take nytt, and the plural would take nye.
Is sykler here the plural of sykkel or a verb form?
Here sykler is the 1st/3rd person present tense of the verb sykle (to cycle), meaning “I cycle” or “I am cycling”. The noun sykkel has the plural sykler too, but context (followed by til parken) shows it's a verb.
Why is there no progressive like “am cycling”? Why just sykler?
Norwegian does not have a separate present-progressive tense. The simple present (jeg sykler) covers both habitual and ongoing actions. Context (especially i dag) clarifies that it's happening right now.
Can jeg be omitted after og? Could I say Jeg har en ny sykkel og sykler til parken i dag?
Yes. If the subject is the same in both clauses, you can drop it in the second clause: Jeg har en ny sykkel og sykler til parken i dag is perfectly natural. Including jeg again is optional and can add emphasis or clarity.
Why is there a comma before og? Is it mandatory?
In Norwegian, placing a comma before og when it connects two independent clauses is optional. Many writers include it for clarity: Jeg har en ny sykkel, og jeg sykler til parken i dag. In informal writing, you can omit it.
Why is i dag placed at the end of the sentence?
Time adverbials like i dag can appear in several positions. At the end is common and follows the usual Subject–Verb–Object/Adverbial order in a main clause: jeg sykler til parken i dag.
What if i dag starts the sentence? Does word order change?
Yes. If i dag comes first, it occupies the first position, and you invert subject and verb: I dag sykler jeg til parken.
Why til parken and not til park or til en park?
Using the definite form parken means “to the park” – a specific park known in context. If you meant “to a park” in general, you'd say til en park, but here the speaker refers to a particular park.