Breakdown of Hvis studenten hadde spurt tidligere, ville læreren ha svart raskt.
ha
to have
hvis
if
spørre
to ask
tidligere
earlier
ville
would
svare
to answer
raskt
quickly
studenten
the student
læreren
the teacher
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Norwegian grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Hvis studenten hadde spurt tidligere, ville læreren ha svart raskt.
What tense is hadde spurt and why is it used here?
Hadde spurt is the pluperfect (pluskvamperfekt) in Norwegian. It’s formed with the imperfect of å ha (hadde) + the past participle of the main verb (spurt). We use it in conditional sentences to refer to an action that would have occurred before another past action—in this case, the student’s asking happening before the teacher’s answering.
What’s the difference between har spurt and hadde spurt?
Har spurt is the present perfect, used for actions completed at an unspecified time before now. Hadde spurt (pluperfect) places that completed action further back, before another past event. In our sentence, the hypothetical “asking” must come before the hypothetical “answering,” so we choose pluperfect.
Why does the main clause start with ville instead of læreren?
When a subordinate clause (introduced by hvis) comes first, the following main clause undergoes inversion: the verb (ville) precedes the subject (læreren). If you flip the order—main clause first—no inversion is needed.
Why do we say ha svart after ville instead of hatt svart?
After modal-like verbs such as ville, Norwegian uses a bare infinitive (ha) + past participle (svart). Using hatt would turn it into a perfect infinitive, which isn’t standard here. The pattern is always ville ha + past participle.
Could you omit ha and say ville svart?
Colloquially some speakers might drop ha and say ville svart, but the standard written form is ville ha svart to clearly mark the conditional perfect.
Why is raskt used instead of rask?
Raskt is the adverbial form of the adjective rask. Since it modifies the verb ha svart, you need an adverb (raskt) rather than the adjective.
What’s the difference between vil and ville?
Vil is present tense (will), expressing real future intent. Ville is either past tense or a conditional marker (would). In hypothetical or unreal conditions like this, we use ville to signal “would have.”
How would the sentence look without inversion?
If you put the main clause first, no inversion is required:
Læreren ville ha svart raskt hvis studenten hadde spurt tidligere.