Breakdown of Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker eller ikke.
Questions & Answers about Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker eller ikke.
What does det kommer an på mean as a whole?
It means it depends on.
This is a fixed expression in Norwegian:
- å komme an på = to depend on
So in this sentence:
- Det kommer an på ... = It depends on ...
You usually learn it as a chunk, because the meaning is not completely obvious if you translate each word separately.
Why is det used at the beginning?
Here, det is a dummy subject or formal subject, similar to English it in it depends.
It does not refer to a specific thing. It is just required to make the sentence grammatically complete.
Compare:
- It depends on the weather.
- Det kommer an på været.
So det here works very much like English it.
Why is it kommer an på and not just one word?
Because å komme an på is a phrasal/particle-style expression in Norwegian.
Its parts are:
- kommer = present tense of å komme
- an
- på
Together, they form the idiomatic meaning depends on.
In main clauses, Norwegian often splits this kind of expression:
- Det kommer an på ...
But in the infinitive, you usually see the full form together:
- å komme an på noe = to depend on something
So you should learn komme an på as one expression, even though the words can appear separated in a sentence.
What does om mean here?
Here, om means whether.
So:
- om dreneringen virker eller ikke = whether the drainage works or not
This is a very common use of om in Norwegian.
It can sometimes correspond to English if, but in sentences like this, whether is usually the better explanation:
- I don’t know if/whether it works
= Jeg vet ikke om det virker
So in your sentence, om introduces an indirect yes/no question.
Why is it dreneringen and not drenering?
Because dreneringen is the definite form of the noun.
- drenering = drainage / drainage system
- dreneringen = the drainage / the drainage system
The ending -en marks definiteness for this masculine noun.
So the sentence is talking about a specific drainage system, not drainage in general:
- om dreneringen virker = whether the drainage works
What does virker mean here?
Virker is the present tense of å virke.
In this sentence, it means:
- works
- functions
- possibly is effective
So:
- dreneringen virker = the drainage works
Be aware that å virke can have several meanings depending on context, such as:
- to work / function
- to seem / appear
- to have an effect
Here, the natural meaning is to function properly.
Why is the sentence om dreneringen virker and not om virker dreneringen?
Because after om, you have a subordinate clause, and subordinate clauses in Norwegian do not use the main-clause inversion pattern.
Main clause:
- Dreneringen virker. = The drainage works.
Subordinate clause after om:
- ... om dreneringen virker ...
You keep the normal subject + verb order:
- dreneringen
- virker
So om virker dreneringen would be wrong here.
Why does the sentence end with eller ikke?
Eller ikke means or not.
So:
- om dreneringen virker eller ikke = whether the drainage works or not
This is a very common pattern in Norwegian:
- om ... eller ikke = whether ... or not
It makes the meaning explicit, but sometimes Norwegian can omit eller ikke if the context is clear:
- Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker.
That can still mean essentially the same thing, but eller ikke emphasizes the contrast between the two possibilities.
Why is ikke placed after eller here?
Because eller ikke is a fixed expression meaning or not.
You should think of it as one unit:
- eller ikke = or not
So the structure is:
- om X virker eller ikke
This is the normal Norwegian way to say whether X works or not.
Is Det kommer an på the only way to say this?
No. A very common alternative is:
- Det avhenger av om dreneringen virker eller ikke.
That also means It depends on whether the drainage works or not.
The difference is mainly style:
- Det kommer an på = very common, natural, everyday
- Det avhenger av = also common, slightly more formal or neutral in tone
Both are correct.
Can om dreneringen virker eller ikke be translated literally word for word?
Not perfectly. A rough word-for-word breakdown is:
- om = whether / if
- dreneringen = the drainage
- virker = works
- eller ikke = or not
So the clause is:
- whether the drainage works or not
That is actually quite close to the English structure, but the full sentence should still be learned naturally as:
- Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker eller ikke.
- It depends on whether the drainage works or not.
Could I replace om with hvis here?
Normally, no.
- om here means whether
- hvis means if in the sense of in case / on condition that
So:
- Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker eller ikke.
= It depends on whether the drainage works or not.
But hvis would suggest a condition rather than an indirect question, which is not the right structure here.
A good rule:
- Use om for whether
- Use hvis for conditional if
What is the basic structure of the whole sentence?
It breaks down like this:
- Det = dummy subject
- kommer an på = depends on
- om dreneringen virker eller ikke = whether the drainage works or not
So the pattern is:
- Det kommer an på + subordinate clause
This is a very useful structure to learn, because you can reuse it with many other clauses, for example:
- Det kommer an på om han har tid. = It depends on whether he has time.
- Det kommer an på om de kan hjelpe. = It depends on whether they can help.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Det kommer an på om dreneringen virker eller ikke to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions