Breakdown of Bildestabiliseringen fungerer godt.
Questions & Answers about Bildestabiliseringen fungerer godt.
Why is bildestabiliseringen one long word?
Because Norwegian, like German and unlike English, very often makes compound nouns by writing them as one word.
So:
- bilde = image / picture
- stabilisering = stabilization
Together:
- bildestabilisering = image stabilization
Then Norwegian adds the definite ending to the whole noun:
- bildestabiliseringen = the image stabilization
A useful rule is that Norwegian usually does not write this as separate words the way English does.
Why does bildestabiliseringen end in -en?
The ending -en marks the noun as definite singular.
Here the base noun is:
- en bildestabilisering = an image stabilization / image stabilization
And the definite form is:
- bildestabiliseringen = the image stabilization
In Norwegian, definiteness is often shown by adding an ending to the noun instead of putting a separate word like the in front.
What decides the gender of bildestabilisering?
In Norwegian compounds, the last part usually decides the grammatical gender.
Here the last part is:
- stabilisering
This is a masculine noun in Bokmål:
- en stabilisering
So the full compound is also masculine:
- en bildestabilisering
- bildestabiliseringen
This is a very useful pattern for understanding long compound nouns.
What form is fungerer?
Fungerer is the present tense of å fungere = to function / to work.
So:
- å fungere = to function
- fungerer = functions / is working / works
In this sentence, it means something like works or functions.
A lot of Norwegian verbs in the present tense end in -r:
- snakker = speaks / is speaking
- liker = likes
- fungerer = works / functions
Why is it godt and not god?
Because godt is being used as an adverb, modifying the verb fungerer.
Compare:
en god kameraapp = a good camera app
- here god describes a noun, so it is an adjective
kameraappen fungerer godt = the camera app works well
- here godt describes how it works, so it functions as an adverb
In Norwegian, the adverb form is often the same as the neuter singular form of the adjective:
- god → godt
So:
- fungerer godt = works well
Could you also say fungerer bra?
Yes. Fungerer bra is very common and natural.
Both are fine:
- fungerer godt
- fungerer bra
Very roughly:
- bra is extremely common in everyday speech
- godt can sound a bit more formal, careful, or written, depending on context
But both are normal Norwegian.
What is the word order in this sentence?
The sentence has the normal main-clause order:
- Bildestabiliseringen = subject
- fungerer = finite verb
- godt = adverb
So the pattern is:
- Subject + verb + adverb
This is also consistent with the Norwegian V2 rule: in main clauses, the finite verb is typically in the second position.
Since the subject comes first here, the verb naturally comes right after it.
Is there anything special about the definite form here compared with English?
Yes. English says:
- the image stabilization
Norwegian usually expresses this with a suffix:
- bildestabiliseringen
So instead of a separate word like the, Norwegian often attaches definiteness directly to the noun.
That is one of the biggest structural differences English speakers notice.
How would this sentence sound without the definite form?
It would be:
- Bildestabilisering fungerer godt.
But that is less natural in most ordinary contexts if you mean a specific image stabilization system.
More commonly, you would say:
- Bildestabiliseringen fungerer godt. = The image stabilization works well.
The definite form is natural when talking about a particular camera, phone, or device feature already being discussed.
How do you pronounce bildestabiliseringen fungerer godt?
A rough English-friendly approximation is:
- BIL-deh-stah-bih-lih-seh-RING-en fung-GEH-rer got
A few notes:
- bildestabiliseringen has the main stress toward -ring-
- fungerer is usually pronounced with a clear ng sound
- godt is pronounced more like gott than like English goat
Pronunciation varies somewhat by dialect, but this approximation is close enough to help you recognize it.
Is bildestabilisering a common everyday word?
Yes, especially in contexts like cameras, phones, lenses, and video equipment.
It is a technical or product-related word, but very normal in that context. Norwegian often forms such technical terms as compounds, so once you get used to them, they become much easier to read:
- bildestabilisering = image stabilization
- autofokus = autofocus
- bildekvalitet = image quality
So even if the word looks long, its structure is very typical Norwegian.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Bildestabiliseringen fungerer godt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions