Ibu masuk dan ketawa kecil kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Malay grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Malay now

Questions & Answers about Ibu masuk dan ketawa kecil kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.

Why is it just Ibu and not ibu saya (“my mother”) in this sentence?

In Malay, close family terms like ibu (mother), ayah (father), kakak (older sister), abang (older brother), etc., are often used without a possessive word when the relationship is obvious from context.

So Ibu masuk… can naturally mean:

  • “Mom came in…” (if the speaker is the child), or
  • “The mother came in…” (if the narrator is talking about some family).

You could say Ibu saya masuk… (“my mother came in”), but in stories and everyday speech, dropping saya is very common and sounds natural.


Can masuk stand alone like this? Doesn’t it need ke or an object?

Yes, masuk can stand alone.

  • masuk literally means “to enter / to come in” and can be used intransitively (without an object or preposition) when the place is obvious from context.

For example:

  • Ibu masuk.Mother came in / entered (the room, the house, etc.).
  • Dia sudah masuk.He/She has already gone in.

If you mention the destination explicitly, you normally add ke or a more detailed phrase:

  • Ibu masuk ke dapur.Mother went into the kitchen.
  • Dia masuk ke dalam rumah.He/She entered the house.

There is also a different form memasukkan or masukkan, which is transitive:

  • Dia memasukkan buku ke dalam beg.He/She put the book into the bag.

In your sentence, Ibu masuk is fine and natural as “Mother came in.”


What exactly does ketawa kecil mean? Is kecil really “small” here?

Literally, ketawa = “to laugh”, kecil = “small”.

When combined as ketawa kecil, it means “to laugh softly / to give a small laugh / to chuckle”.
So kecil describes the manner or intensity of the laugh, not physical size.

It’s similar to English phrases like:

  • “give a little laugh”
  • “let out a small chuckle”

Other possible variants:

  • ketawa perlahan – laugh quietly/softly
  • ketawa kecil-kecil – also used to mean laughing in a small, soft way

So Ibu … ketawa kecil suggests a gentle, possibly amused or slightly embarrassed little laugh.


What is the difference between kerana and sebab? Could we use sebab here instead?

Both kerana and sebab mean “because”.

  • kerana
    • Slightly more formal and common in writing, but still very normal in speech.
  • sebab
    • More colloquial and very common in everyday conversation.

Grammatically, they work the same:

  • Ibu ketawa kecil kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.
  • Ibu ketawa kecil sebab dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.

Both are correct. Changing kerana to sebab here does not change the basic meaning, only the tone (a bit more casual).


Who does dia refer to here? And does dia mean “he” or “she”?

In Malay, dia is a third-person singular pronoun and it covers both “he” and “she”. There is no gender distinction.

In your sentence:

Ibu masuk dan ketawa kecil kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.

The most natural interpretation is that dia = Ibu (the mother). The context links dia back to the most recent relevant person, which is Ibu.

So the idea is:

  • Mother came in and laughed quietly
  • because she also secretly ate some jam in the kitchen.

It could refer to another person if the broader context introduces someone else, but with just this sentence, readers will assume dia refers to Ibu.


What does juga add in dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem? Where can juga go?

juga means “also / too / as well”.

In dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem, it indicates that:

  • Someone else (maybe the children) has already done this,
  • and she also did the same thing.

About position:

  1. dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem

    • Very natural. Focus is on dia (she also did it).
  2. dia diam-diam juga makan sedikit jem

    • Possible, but sounds a bit odd; it can sometimes suggest the “also” is on the action (she secretly also ate, in addition to doing something else).
  3. dia diam-diam makan sedikit jem juga

    • “She secretly ate a bit of jam as well (in addition to something else she ate).”

In practice, dia juga diam-diam makan… is the most straightforward way to say “she also, secretly, ate…”. The placement of juga can slightly shift what is being emphasised as “also” (the person, the action, or the object).


What does diam-diam mean? How is it different from diam?
  • diam by itself means “to be silent / to keep quiet”.
  • diam-diam (reduplication) means “quietly; secretly; on the sly”.

So:

  • Dia diam. – He/She is silent / not talking.
  • Dia diam-diam makan jem. – He/She eats jam secretly / on the sly / without others noticing.

The reduplication here adds the nuance of doing something quietly in a hidden way, not just “twice silent”. This is common in Malay:

  • pelan-pelan – slowly, carefully
  • senyap-senyap – secretly / quietly
  • curi-curi – sneakily

Position-wise, diam-diam can be:

  • Before the verb: dia diam-diam makan jem
  • After the verb: dia makan jem diam-diam

Both are correct; before the verb is slightly more neutral in this sentence.


Why is it makan sedikit jem, not memakan sedikit jem?

In everyday Malay, the simple verb makan is much more common than memakan.

  • makan – to eat (neutral, used in almost all normal contexts)
  • memakan – also “to eat / consume”, but:
    • more formal or bookish
    • often used figuratively:
      • Kebakaran itu memakan banyak korban.The fire claimed many victims.
      • Projek itu memakan masa tiga tahun.That project took three years.

In your sentence, makan sedikit jem is exactly what you want.
Memakan sedikit jem would sound a bit stiff for a simple, everyday action like this, especially in a narrative with a light tone.


Is sedikit jem the only correct order? Could we say jem sedikit instead?

Both are possible, but there is a nuance in emphasis.

  • makan sedikit jem

    • Literally “eat a little jam”.
    • sedikit in front of jem is very natural; it simply means a small amount of jam.
  • makan jem sedikit

    • Also means “eat a little jam”, but the focus can feel a bit more on “only a little (not much)”.
    • In speech, this sometimes has a reassuring or contrastive feel:
      • e.g. Dia makan jem sedikit saja – He/She only ate a little (not a lot).

In your sentence, makan sedikit jem is perfectly normal and perhaps slightly more neutral. makan jem sedikit is also grammatical and understandable; the difference is subtle.


Why is it di dapur and not ke dapur? Don’t we have movement “to the kitchen”?

In this sentence, di dapur is attached to the eating, not to the entering.

… dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.
→ She also secretly ate a bit of jam in the kitchen.

  • di means “at / in” (location, static).
  • ke means “to / towards” (direction, movement).

If you wanted to express movement into the kitchen, you’d say:

  • Ibu masuk ke dapur. – Mother went into the kitchen.
  • Dia pergi ke dapur. – He/She went to the kitchen.

But here, di dapur is specifying where the secret eating happened, not where she entered. So di dapur (“in the kitchen”) is correct and natural.


How is past tense shown here? There’s no word like “did” or “was”.

Malay verbs do not change form for tense (past, present, future).
Time is understood from context and, if needed, from time expressions.

In your sentence, everything is in the past simply because it’s a narrative context. The reader infers that:

  • Ibu masuk – Mother came in
  • dan ketawa kecil – and (she) laughed quietly
  • kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem… – because she also secretly ate a bit of jam…

To make past time explicit, you could add time words:

  • tadi – earlier / a while ago
  • semalam – yesterday
  • pada masa itu – at that time

Example:

  • Tadi, ibu masuk dan ketawa kecil kerana dia juga diam-diam makan sedikit jem di dapur.

Malay also has optional aspect markers:

  • sudah / telah – already / have (done)
  • sedang – in the middle of doing

But your original sentence is perfectly natural without any of these; past-ness is understood from context.


Could we say Ibu datang dan ketawa kecil instead of Ibu masuk dan ketawa kecil? What’s the difference between datang and masuk?
  • datang = to come (to a place)
  • masuk = to enter / to go in

They’re related but not the same:

  • Ibu datang.

    • Mother came (here / to this place).
    • Focus: she arrived.
  • Ibu masuk.

    • Mother went in / came into the room/house/etc.
    • Focus: she crossed into an inside space.

In many contexts, if people already know we’re inside a room or house, Ibu masuk sounds more specific and visual: she comes in through the door into where we are.

You could say Ibu datang dan ketawa kecil, but:

  • it sounds a bit more like “Mother came (over) and laughed quietly”.
  • masuk gives a clearer mental image of her stepping into the room or space.

So the original choice masuk is slightly more vivid and appropriate for an “entering the scene” action.