Breakdown of Magistra discipulae tabulam dat, ut in ea clare scribat.
Questions & Answers about Magistra discipulae tabulam dat, ut in ea clare scribat.
What case is each main noun in this sentence, and how can I tell?
magistra = nominative singular
It is the subject: the teacher is the one doing the giving.discipulae = dative singular
It is the indirect object: the student is the one to whom something is given.tabulam = accusative singular
It is the direct object: the tablet is the thing being given.
A very common pattern in Latin is:
someone + someone-to-whom + thing + gives
So here:
- magistra = giver
- discipulae = recipient
- tabulam = thing given
Why is discipulae dative here? Could it mean something else?
Yes, discipulae can have several possible forms depending on context:
- dative singular = to/for the student
- genitive singular = of the student
- nominative plural = the students
But here the verb dat (gives) strongly points to a dative of indirect object, because dare often takes:
- a direct object = the thing given
- a dative = the person receiving it
So magistra discipulae tabulam dat means: The teacher gives a tablet to the student.
Why is tabulam in the accusative?
Because it is the direct object of dat.
The verb dare means to give, and the thing being given is put in the accusative.
So:
- tabula = a tablet
- tabulam = a tablet / the tablet as direct object
In other words, the teacher is giving the tablet, so tabulam must be accusative.
What does ut mean here?
Here ut means so that or in order that.
It introduces a purpose clause:
- Magistra discipulae tabulam dat = The teacher gives the student a tablet
- ut in ea clare scribat = so that she may write clearly on it
So the second part explains the purpose of giving the tablet.
This is a very important Latin pattern:
ut + subjunctive = purpose clause
Why is scribat subjunctive instead of indicative?
Because it is inside an ut-purpose clause.
Latin normally uses:
- ut + subjunctive for positive purpose: so that / in order that
- ne + subjunctive for negative purpose: so that ... not
So:
- scribit = she writes / is writing (indicative)
- scribat = that she may write / so that she might write (subjunctive)
In this sentence, the writing is not just being stated as a fact. It is the purpose for which the tablet is given.
Who is the subject of scribat?
The subject is understood, not stated directly.
From the sense of the sentence, the most natural subject is discipula:
- The teacher gives the student a tablet
- so that the student may write on it clearly
Latin often leaves out subject pronouns when they are understood from context.
So scribat means he/she may write, and here context tells us it is she, namely the student.
Why does scribat mean he/she may write? How do I recognize the form?
scribat is:
- from scribere = to write
- present subjunctive active
- 3rd person singular
That means it can mean:
- he may write
- she may write
- it may write
The ending -at is a clue for 3rd person singular present subjunctive in a 3rd-conjugation verb like scribere.
Compare:
- scribit = she writes (indicative)
- scribat = that she may write / so that she may write (subjunctive)
What does in ea mean, and why is it ea instead of eam?
in ea means on it or in it, depending on context.
Here, with tabula (tablet/writing tablet), the natural sense is on it.
The form ea is ablative singular feminine, because:
- in + ablative = location: in/on
- in + accusative = motion into/onto
So:
- in ea = on it / in it (location)
- in eam would suggest motion onto it / into it
Since the student is writing on the tablet, not moving into it, Latin uses in ea.
What does ea refer to?
ea refers back to tabulam.
The pronoun comes from is, ea, id and must agree with what it refers to in:
- gender
- number
Since tabula is:
- feminine
- singular
the pronoun is also feminine singular.
Its case is ablative because of the preposition in:
- tabulam = accusative, because it is the direct object of dat
- ea = ablative, because it follows in meaning location
So the pronoun changes case depending on its job in the sentence.
What does clare do in the sentence?
clare is an adverb, from clarus.
It means something like:
- clearly
- plainly
- sometimes neatly or legibly, depending on context
It modifies scribat, not dat.
So it tells us how the student is supposed to write.
Structure:
- scribat = may write
- clare scribat = may write clearly
Why is the word order like this? Is it fixed?
Latin word order is much freer than English word order, because the endings show the grammar.
This sentence is:
Magistra discipulae tabulam dat, ut in ea clare scribat.
A different order could still mean the same thing, for example:
- Magistra tabulam discipulae dat...
- Tabulam magistra discipulae dat...
The cases tell you who is doing what:
- magistra = subject
- discipulae = indirect object
- tabulam = direct object
So Latin word order often reflects emphasis or style, not basic grammatical function.
Could ut in ea clare scribat be translated literally as that she may write clearly on it?
Yes. A very literal translation would be:
The teacher gives the student a tablet, so that she may write clearly on it.
In smoother English, you might also say:
- ...in order that she may write clearly on it
- ...so that she can write clearly on it
All of those represent the same Latin structure.
Why doesn’t Latin use a normal infinitive here, like English sometimes does?
English often says:
- The teacher gives the student a tablet to write on.
Latin usually does not express this kind of purpose with a simple infinitive in the same way. Instead, Latin commonly uses a purpose clause:
ut + subjunctive
So where English may use:
- to write
Latin often prefers:
- ut ... scribat = so that ... she may write
This is one of the big differences between English and Latin syntax.
Is there anything special about the verb dat?
Yes. dat is:
- from dare = to give
- 3rd person singular present active indicative
It means:
- he gives
- she gives
- it gives
Here it is she gives, because the subject is magistra.
Also, dare is a very common verb that often takes:
- a direct object in the accusative
- an indirect object in the dative
That pattern appears clearly here:
- tabulam = what is given
- discipulae = to whom it is given
Could discipulae be the one doing the writing even though it is dative?
Yes, in meaning, absolutely.
Even though discipulae is grammatically the indirect object in the main clause, it is still the most natural understood subject of scribat in the purpose clause.
So the sentence works like this:
- In the main clause: discipulae = to the student
- In the purpose clause: the understood subject is the student
Latin does not need to repeat discipula in nominative form if the meaning is already clear from context.
So the idea is: The teacher gives the student a tablet so that the student may write clearly on it.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Magistra discipulae tabulam dat, ut in ea clare scribat to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions