Breakdown of Mare hodie placidum est, et nautae laeti sunt.
Questions & Answers about Mare hodie placidum est, et nautae laeti sunt.
Why is mare followed by placidum and not placida or placidus?
Because placidum has to agree with mare in gender, number, and case.
- mare = sea
- It is neuter
- It is singular
- Here it is nominative (the subject)
So the adjective must also be neuter singular nominative:
- masculine: placidus
- feminine: placida
- neuter: placidum
That is why Latin says mare placidum est = the sea is calm.
What case is mare, and how can I tell?
Mare is nominative singular.
It is the subject of est (is), so nominative is what we expect.
This noun belongs to the third declension, and its nominative singular form is mare. In this sentence:
- mare = subject
- est = verb
- placidum = adjective describing the subject
So the basic structure is: The sea is calm.
Why is placidum neuter singular nominative if it comes after est?
Because it is a predicate adjective. In Latin, an adjective after a form of esse (to be) still agrees with the noun it describes.
So in:
- mare placidum est
both mare and placidum are nominative singular neuter.
This is similar to English The sea is calm, where calm describes the subject rather than acting as an object.
Why is nautae masculine if it ends in -ae?
Because nauta is one of the common Latin nouns that is first declension in form but masculine in meaning and grammar.
So:
- singular: nauta = sailor
- plural: nautae = sailors
Even though -a / -ae often looks feminine, some jobs or male persons in Latin are first declension but masculine, such as:
- nauta = sailor
- poeta = poet
- agricola = farmer
That is why the adjective is laeti, not laetae.
Why is it laeti and not laetae?
Because laeti agrees with nautae, and nautae is masculine plural here.
So the adjective must also be masculine plural nominative:
- masculine plural: laeti
- feminine plural: laetae
- neuter plural: laeta
Thus:
- nautae laeti sunt = the sailors are happy
Why do we have est with mare but sunt with nautae?
Because the verb esse (to be) must agree with its subject in number.
- mare is singular, so Latin uses est = is
- nautae is plural, so Latin uses sunt = are
So:
- mare ... est = the sea ... is
- nautae ... sunt = the sailors ... are
What is hodie, and why doesn’t it change form?
Hodie means today, and it is an adverb.
Adverbs in Latin do not agree with nouns the way adjectives do, so hodie stays the same form. It tells us when the sea is calm.
So:
- Mare hodie placidum est = The sea is calm today
You could also move hodie to another place in the sentence without changing the basic meaning, for example:
- Hodie mare placidum est
- Mare placidum hodie est
Latin word order is flexible.
Why is the word order different from English?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English because Latin shows grammatical relationships mainly through endings, not fixed position.
English usually prefers:
- The sea is calm today, and the sailors are happy.
Latin can say:
- Mare hodie placidum est, et nautae laeti sunt.
Even though the order is different, the endings show what goes together:
- mare with placidum
- nautae with laeti
- est for the singular subject
- sunt for the plural subject
So the meaning stays clear.
Why is there no word for the?
Because classical Latin has no definite article and no indefinite article.
So Latin does not have separate words for:
- the
- a
- an
That means:
- mare can mean sea, the sea, or sometimes a sea
- nautae can mean sailors or the sailors
You understand which is best from context.
What does et do, and where does it go?
Et means and. It connects the two parts of the sentence:
- Mare hodie placidum est
- nautae laeti sunt
So the full sentence means:
- The sea is calm today, and the sailors are happy.
Et is the ordinary Latin word for and and is very common.
Is laeti sunt literally are happy?
Yes. Sunt means are, and laeti means happy.
Together they form a normal Latin way to say are happy:
- nautae laeti sunt = the sailors are happy
Just as in the first half:
- mare placidum est = the sea is calm
Latin often uses noun + adjective + form of esse for this kind of statement.
How would this sentence be pronounced?
A common classroom pronunciation would be roughly:
- MAH-reh HOH-dee-eh PLAH-kee-doom est, et NOW-tie LYE-tee soont
A few useful points:
- mare = MAH-reh
- hodie = HOH-dee-eh
- placidum = PLAH-kee-doom
- nautae = NOW-tie in a common classical-style pronunciation
- laeti = LYE-tee in a common classical-style pronunciation
- sunt = soont
Pronunciation systems can vary a little depending on whether someone is using a classical or ecclesiastical style.
Could Latin leave out est or sunt here?
Sometimes Latin, especially in poetry or very compressed style, can omit a form of esse if the meaning is obvious. But in a normal beginner sentence like this, est and sunt are included.
So this sentence is a straightforward, complete prose sentence:
- mare ... est
- nautae ... sunt
That makes the grammar especially clear for learners.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Mare hodie placidum est, et nautae laeti sunt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions