Log inSign up

Puella audax in caupona sedet et panem cum caseo edit.

Puella audax in caupona sedet et panem cum caseo edit.
The bold girl sits in the inn and eats bread with cheese.
FromLesson 13inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Puella audax in caupona sedet et panem cum caseo edit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

mercatuscaseusolivaMater olivas in foro emit.plenusServus sportam plenam ad villam portat.In mercatu panem, caseum, et olivas emit, et sporta eius plena est.sitis

Questions & Answers about Puella audax in caupona sedet et panem cum caseo edit.

Why is puella in the form puella and not something else?
Puella is nominative singular, the form used for the subject of the sentence—the person doing the actions (sedet and edit). In first-declension nouns like puella, puellae, the nominative singular ends in -a.
What is audax doing here, and why doesn’t it look like bona or another -a adjective?

Audax is an adjective meaning bold/brave, describing puella. It belongs to a different adjective type (often called a 3rd-declension adjective), so it doesn’t use the -a/-us/-um pattern.
Even though it looks the same for masculine and feminine in the nominative singular (audax), it still agrees with puella in case (nominative) and number (singular).

Why does the adjective come after the noun (puella audax)—is word order fixed?

Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. Adjectives can go before or after their nouns.
Often:

  • noun + adjective (as here: puella audax) is a common neutral pattern.
  • adjective + noun can add emphasis or a slightly different feel.
    Both puella audax and audax puella are grammatically possible.
Why is it in caupona and not in cauponam?

Because in can take two different cases with different meanings:

  • in + ablative = in/at/on (location, where?) → in cauponā
  • in + accusative = into/onto (motion toward, where to?) → in cauponam
    Here the meaning is location (she is sitting in a tavern), so it’s ablative.
What case is caupona, and what does its ending tell me?
Cauponā is ablative singular of caupona, cauponae (1st declension). The long -ā ending (often written without a macron in many texts) signals ablative singular for first-declension nouns.
What form is sedet, and how do I know who is doing the sitting?

Sedet is 3rd person singular present active indicative of sedēre (to sit). The ending -t tells you it means he/she/it sits.
Latin often omits an explicit subject pronoun, because the verb ending already carries the person/number information.

Why are there two verbs (sedet and edit) without repeating the subject?

Latin can use one subject (puella audax) and then coordinate verbs with et (and). The subject is understood to apply to both actions:

  • sedet = she sits
  • edit = (she) eats
    No need to repeat puella.
What form is edit—does it have anything to do with English edit?
Here edit is from edere (to eat) and means he/she eats (3rd person singular present). It is not related to the English verb edit (which comes from Latin ēdere meaning to publish/put forth, a different verb that happens to look similar).
Why is panem spelled like that—what case is it and why?

Panem is accusative singular of pānis, pānis (bread, 3rd declension). It’s accusative because it’s the direct object of edit (what she eats).
Many 3rd-declension masculine nouns have accusative singular in -em (like panem).

Why is it cum caseo and not cum caseum?

Cum (with) takes the ablative case, so caseus becomes caseō (ablative singular).

  • nominative: caseus
  • ablative: caseō
    So cum caseō = with cheese.
Is panem cum caseo one unit, and what exactly does cum caseo modify?
Yes: panem cum caseō functions together as the object phrase—bread with cheese. The cum + ablative phrase (cum caseō) describes the bread she is eating (bread accompanied by cheese / bread with cheese).
Why isn’t there a word for the or a (articles) in Latin?
Classical Latin has no definite or indefinite articles (no direct equivalents of the/a/an). Whether puella means a girl or the girl depends on context. Latin can signal specificity in other ways (word order, demonstratives like haec/illa, etc.), but often it’s simply inferred.