Log inSign up

Puer tunicam puram induit et ad scholam currit.

Puer tunicam puram induit et ad scholam currit.
The boy puts on a clean tunic and runs to the school.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin

Breakdown of Puer tunicam puram induit et ad scholam currit.

puer
the boy
et
and
ad
to
schola
the school
currere
to run
purus
clean
tunica
the tunic
induere
to put on
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Puer tunicam puram induit et ad scholam currit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Puer tunicam puram induit et ad scholam currit.

Why is puer used instead of something like puerum?

Because puer is the nominative singular form, used for the subject of the sentence (the boy).
Puerum would be accusative singular and would normally be used as a direct object.

What case is tunicam, and why is it in that case?
Tunicam is accusative singular. It’s accusative because it’s the direct object of induit: the boy puts on something (he puts on a tunic).
How do we know puram goes with tunicam?

Because puram matches tunicam in gender, number, and case:

  • tunica is feminine
  • tunicam is singular accusative
    So the adjective must be feminine singular accusative too: puram.
    This agreement is the main signal, more than word order.
Why is the adjective placed after the noun (tunicam puram)—could it come before?

Yes, it could also be puram tunicam. Both are grammatical.
Often, noun + adjective is a neutral/default pattern, while adjective + noun can feel more emphatic or selective (like a clean tunic as opposed to some other tunic), but context matters.

What tense is induit? Is it present or perfect?

Without macrons, induit is ambiguous: it can be either

  • present: he puts on, or
  • perfect: he put on / has put on.

In this sentence, currit is clearly present (he runs), so learners usually take induit as present too: he puts on … and runs …. (In a story, an author could also use a “historic present,” but the straightforward reading here is present.)

What about currit—what form is it?

Currit is 3rd person singular present active indicative of currere (to run): he/she/it runs.
Its perfect would be cucurrit (he ran), which helps distinguish tense here.

Why isn’t there a word for the or a in Latin?

Classical Latin has no articles like English the / a.
So puer can mean the boy or a boy depending on context, and tunicam puram can be a clean tunic or the clean tunic.

Why does ad take scholam (accusative) instead of something like a dative?

Because ad regularly takes the accusative to show motion toward a place: ad scholam = to/toward the school.
The accusative here is not a direct object; it’s the object of the preposition ad.

Could Latin use in scholam instead of ad scholam?

Yes, and the meaning shifts slightly:

  • ad scholam = to/toward the school (destination, not emphasizing entry)
  • in scholam (with accusative) = into the school (emphasizes going inside)
Why is et used once, not something like a comma or -que?

Et is the straightforward word for and. Latin can also use:

  • -que attached to the second word (… induit scholamque currit) = and, often tighter pairing
  • ac/atque = often and with a sense of and also (common with close connections)
    Here, et is the simplest, most common choice.
Is the word order fixed? Could we rearrange the sentence?

Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. Many rearrangements can be correct, e.g.

  • Tunicam puram puer induit et ad scholam currit.
    The meaning stays basically the same, though the emphasis can change depending on what comes first.
How would you negate this sentence (say The boy doesn’t put on… and doesn’t run…)?

You typically use non before the verb (or before what you want to negate):

  • Puer tunicam puram non induit et ad scholam non currit.
    If you only want to negate one action, you negate only that verb.