Breakdown of sutgaragi eobseoseo pokeuro babeul meogeossdeoni jogeum isanghaesseo.
Questions & Answers about sutgaragi eobseoseo pokeuro babeul meogeossdeoni jogeum isanghaesseo.
Because 없다 works like to not exist / to not be there, so the thing that is absent is usually marked with 이/가.
- 숟가락이 없다 = There is no spoon / a spoon is absent
- 숟가락을 없다 is ungrammatical
You could also say 숟가락은 없어서 if you want contrast, like as for a spoon, there wasn’t one. But the neutral form here is 숟가락이 없어서.
Yes. Here -아서/어서 connects the clause and gives the reason:
- 없어서 = because there isn’t / wasn’t
In connected clauses, Korean often does not mark past tense the same way English does when the time is already clear from context. Since the rest of the sentence is telling a past experience, 숟가락이 없어서 naturally means because there wasn’t a spoon.
A form like 없었어서 is generally not natural here.