naneun hugi myeot gaeman ilggo gasseo.

to go

Breakdown of naneun hugi myeot gaeman ilggo gasseo.

• 읽다: to read
• ~는: topic particle
• 나: I

Questions & Answers about naneun hugi myeot gaeman ilggo gasseo.

Why is it 나는 and not 내가? And what about the shorter 난?

• 나는 uses the topic marker, setting “I” as the topic of the sentence. It’s neutral, common in narratives.
• 난 is just a contracted, more casual form of 나는.
• 내가 uses the subject marker and often answers or emphasizes “who” did the action. Using 내가 here would feel contrastive (“I, not someone else, read a few and went”).

Both 나는 and 난 fit well here; choose based on how casual you want to sound.

Why isn’t there an object particle after 후기? Is 후기 몇 개만을 wrong?

When you use 만 (“only”), it typically replaces case particles like 을/를. With counters, object marking is usually omitted. So:

• Natural: 후기 몇 개만 읽고...
• Over-formal/stilted: 후기 몇 개만을 읽고... If you really want an object marker with a slightly different nuance, you can say 후기만 몇 개를, but that means “only reviews (not other things), a few of them.”

What exactly does 후기 mean? Is 리뷰 the same?