watasi ha raisyuu kenkyuu no kekka wo happyousimasu.

は marks 私 as the topic of the sentence: As for me, ...

So 私は来週研究の結果を発表します presents I as the person being talked about.

If you used が instead, it would put more focus on I as the subject, often with a nuance like I am the one who will present it. In many simple statements like this, は is the more neutral and natural choice.

Many time expressions in Japanese can be used without any particle, and 来週 is one of them.

So:

• 来週発表します = I will present it next week
• 今日行きます = I’m going today
• 明日会います = I’ll meet (someone) tomorrow

Using に after 来週 is usually unnatural here.
A good rule of thumb is that common time words like 今日, 明日, 昨日, 来週, 先月, 去年 often do not take に.

研究の結果 is a noun phrase made of:

• 研究 = research
• の = linking particle
• 結果 = result(s)

Here の connects the two nouns, so the phrase means something like:

• the results of the research
• the research results

In Japanese, A の B is often like B of A or A’s B, but the exact English translation depends on context.

In this sentence, の links 研究 and 結果.

A very common beginner explanation is that の often works like of or an apostrophe-s in English:

• 日本の文化 = the culture of Japan / Japanese culture
• 先生の本 = the teacher’s book
• 研究の結果 = the results of the research

But の is broader than just possession. It can show many kinds of relationships between nouns, including category, origin, description, or association.

を marks the direct object of the verb.

The verb here is 発表します (to present / announce), and the thing being presented is 研究の結果.

So:

• 研究の結果を = the research results as the object
• 発表します = will present / present

Together: (I) will present the research results.

It is the non-past polite form, which can mean either:

• present/habitual: I present
• future: I will present

In this sentence, 来週 makes the time clearly future, so 発表します is understood as will present.

Japanese does not have a separate future tense form like English does. Very often, context or time words tell you whether the meaning is present or future.

The dictionary form is 発表する.

This is a する-verb:

• dictionary form: 発表する
• polite form: 発表します
• past polite: 発表しました
• negative polite: 発表しません

Many nouns can combine with する to make verbs, and 発表 is one of them.

Yes, very often.

If it is already clear from context who is speaking, Japanese commonly leaves out 私. So a natural sentence could simply be:

来週研究の結果を発表します。

This still means I will present the research results next week if the context makes I obvious.

Japanese often omits subjects and topics when they are understood.

Japanese word order is usually topic/time/object/verb, and the verb normally comes at the end.

In this sentence:

• 私 = topic
• 来週 = time
• 研究の結果 = object
• 発表します = verb

So the structure is roughly:

As for me, next week, the research results, will present.

That sounds strange in English, but it is normal in Japanese.
Japanese is much more particle-based than English, so particles like は and を tell you each word’s role.

It can be either, depending on context.

Japanese nouns usually do not show singular/plural the way English nouns do. So 結果 could mean:

• result
• results

In this sentence, English will often translate it as the results of the research, but the result of the research is also possible if the context suggests a single result.

No. Normally, Japanese is written without spaces:

私は来週研究の結果を発表します。

Spaces are often added in textbooks or beginner materials to make the sentence easier to read and to show where words and particles are.

So the spaced version is a learning aid, not standard Japanese writing.

A natural reading is:

わたし は らいしゅう けんきゅう の けっか を はっぴょうします。
Watashi wa raishuu kenkyuu no kekka o happyou shimasu.

A few notes:

• を is written を but pronounced o
• 発表 is read はっぴょう
• 結果 is read けっか

Not by itself.

研究の結果 only means the results of the research or research results. It does not explicitly say whose research it is.

If you wanted to say my research results, you would need something like:

• 私の研究の結果 = the results of my research

In the original sentence, listeners may infer that it is the speaker’s research, but that comes from context, not from the grammar alone.