Log inSign up

Saya memeriksa saku celana saya, ternyata koin saya masih ada.

Saya memeriksa saku celana saya, ternyata koin saya masih ada.
I check my pants pocket; it turns out my coins are still there.

Breakdown of Saya memeriksa saku celana saya, ternyata koin saya masih ada.

saya
I
masih
still
saya
my
memeriksa
to check
ada
to be
ternyata
it turns out
koin
the coin
saku celana
the pants pocket
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Indonesian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Indonesian now

Questions & Answers about Saya memeriksa saku celana saya, ternyata koin saya masih ada.

Why does it use memeriksa instead of just periksa?

Memeriksa is the verb form with the meN- prefix, which is very common in neutral/formal Indonesian for active verbs.

  • Base word: periksa = to examine/check (as a root/command/adjective-like form)
  • Verb: memeriksa = to check/examine (active, standard narrative style)

You can say Saya periksa saku celana saya... in casual speech, but Saya memeriksa... is more standard for writing or careful speech.

Is saku celana saya literally “pocket of my pants”? Why not saku saya?

Indonesian noun phrases typically stack like this:

[main noun] + [modifier noun] + [possessor]
So saku celana saya = pocket (saku) of (my) pants (celana saya) → “my pants pocket / the pocket of my pants.”

Saku saya would mean “my pocket,” which is grammatical but less specific (pocket of what? jacket? bag?). Here the sentence specifies it’s the pants pocket.

Why is celana singular when English says “pants” (plural)?

In Indonesian, celana is grammatically singular and can refer to “a pair of pants” without needing a plural form. If you want to emphasize multiple pairs, you might say celana-celana, but that’s not needed here.

What does ternyata mean and why is it in the middle of the sentence?

Ternyata means something like “it turns out (that) / unexpectedly / as it turned out.” It introduces a result that contrasts with what you might have assumed.

Placement-wise, it often appears at the start of the second clause:

  • ..., ternyata koin saya masih ada. = “..., and it turned out my coin(s) were still there.”

It can also appear earlier depending on emphasis, but this is a very common pattern.

Is the comma required before ternyata?

Not strictly “required,” but it’s very natural because the sentence has two clauses: 1) Saya memeriksa saku celana saya,
2) ternyata koin saya masih ada.

In writing, a comma helps show the pause/change in thought. In speech, you’d naturally pause there.

Why is saya repeated twice? Can it be omitted?

Repeating saya is normal and clear in Indonesian. You can omit it in some contexts, but it depends on clarity.

Common options:

  • Clear/neutral: ..., ternyata koin saya masih ada.
  • More “tight” if context is obvious: ..., ternyata koin masih ada. (could sound like “the coin(s) are still there,” not explicitly “mine”)
  • More specific: ..., ternyata koin saya itu masih ada. (“that coin of mine was still there”)
What exactly does masih ada mean here?

Masih = “still” (something continues to be true)
Ada = “exists / is present / there is/are”

So koin saya masih ada = “my coin(s) are still there / I still have my coin(s) (they’re still present).”

It often implies you worried it was gone, but it remained.

Does koin saya mean one coin or multiple coins? Should it be koin-koin?

Koin can be interpreted as one coin or coins in general, depending on context. Indonesian often leaves number implicit.

If you want to clearly say multiple coins, you can use:

  • koin-koin saya = “my coins”
  • beberapa koin saya = “some of my coins”
  • koin saya masih ada semua = “all my coins are still there”

But the original sentence is natural as-is.

Could I say di saku celana saya instead of just saku celana saya?

Yes, but it slightly changes what you’re emphasizing:

  • memeriksa saku celana saya = “check my pants pocket” (the pocket is the object being checked)
  • memeriksa di saku celana saya = “check in my pants pocket” (focuses more on the location)

Both are used; the version without di is very common and concise.

How casual or formal is this sentence? Could I replace saya with aku?

This is neutral to fairly formal because of saya and memeriksa.

More casual alternatives:

  • Aku cek saku celanaku, ternyata koinku masih ada.
  • Aku periksa kantong celanaku, eh ternyata koinku masih ada.

Notes:

  • cek is a common informal loanword (“check”).
  • kantong is also common for “pocket,” alongside saku.