את הפועל הזה אפשר לכתוב בהווה, בעבר וגם בעתיד.

Because Hebrew allows the object to be moved to the front for emphasis or topic.

• אפשר לכתוב את הפועל הזה... = a more neutral word order
• את הפועל הזה אפשר לכתוב... = as for this verb, it can be written...

So the sentence starts with this verb because that is the thing the speaker wants to highlight.

In this sentence, את is the marker of a definite direct object. It does not really translate into English.

It appears before הפועל הזה because:

• הפועל is definite because of ה־
• הזה also makes it specific: this verb

So Hebrew uses את before it.

Compare:

• לכתוב פועל = to write a verb
• לכתוב את הפועל הזה = to write this verb

Because אפשר is commonly followed by an infinitive.

So:

• אפשר לכתוב = it is possible to write / one can write

This is a very common Hebrew pattern:

• אפשר לראות = one can see
• אפשר ללמוד = one can study
• אפשר לעשות = one can do

So לכתוב is not tied to a person here. It is just the basic to write form.

אפשר is an impersonal word meaning something like:

• it is possible
• one can
• can

It does not agree for gender or number in this use. Hebrew speakers use the same form with different subjects:

• אפשר לכתוב = one can write
• אפשר לראות = one can see

So even though English says this verb can be written, Hebrew naturally says something closer to it is possible to write this verb.

Because Hebrew often prefers an impersonal possible-to-do structure where English uses a passive.

English:

• This verb can be written in the present, past, and future

Hebrew:

• את הפועל הזה אפשר לכתוב...
• literally: This verb, it is possible to write...

A passive version is possible in some contexts, but אפשר + infinitive is extremely natural and common.

Because Hebrew uses the preposition ב־ here, meaning in.

So the idea is:

• בהווה = in the present
• בעבר = in the past
• בעתיד = in the future

In other words, Hebrew is expressing in the present / in the past / in the future, not just naming the tenses by themselves.

These are the normal forms used in this kind of sentence.

Because Hebrew often leaves that word out when the context is already grammatical and clear.

So instead of saying something longer like in the present tense, in the past tense, in the future tense, Hebrew very naturally says simply:

• בהווה
• בעבר
• בעתיד

When the topic is verbs, everybody understands that these refer to verb tense/time forms.

גם means also / too, and וגם means and also.

So:

• בעבר וגם בעתיד = in the past and also in the future

In this sentence, וגם slightly emphasizes the last item in the list. The sentence would still make sense without גם, but וגם sounds very natural.

Because in Hebrew, demonstratives like this usually come after the noun.

So:

• הפועל הזה = this verb
• הספר הזה = this book
• האיש הזה = this man

This is the normal Hebrew pattern:

• the noun + this/that

Yes. פועל can mean verb in grammar.

So:

• פועל = verb
• הפועל = the verb
• הפועל הזה = this verb

In other contexts, words from the same root can be related to action or doing, but here the meaning is clearly the grammatical term verb.