מהמשרד שלי קל להגיע גם למזרח העיר וגם למערב העיר.

Because Hebrew often likes to place the starting point or context early in the sentence.

• מ־ means from
• המשרד means the office
• שלי means my

So מהמשרד שלי literally means from my office.

In English, we might say From my office, it’s easy..., and Hebrew is doing something very similar here.

מהמשרד is a combination of:

• מ־ = from
• ה־ = the
• משרד = office

So:

• מ + ה + משרד
• becomes מהמשרד

This is very common in Hebrew: prepositions like מ־, ב־, and ל־ often attach directly to the noun, and if the noun has ה־ (the), the form changes accordingly.

In Hebrew, possession is often expressed with של.

So:

• המשרד שלי = the office of me = my office

This is a very normal and common way to say possession in modern Hebrew.

English speakers sometimes expect something like a special possessive ending, but in Hebrew, noun + שלי/שלך/שלו is extremely common.

Examples:

• הבית שלי = my house
• החבר שלי = my friend
• המשרד שלי = my office

קל means easy or literally light.

In this sentence, it means easy:

• קל להגיע = it is easy to get/reach

Hebrew often uses קל in this kind of impersonal structure, where English would use it is easy to...

So the sentence does not literally include a word for it, but the meaning is still there.

Because Hebrew often leaves out this kind of dummy subject.

In English, we need:

• It is easy to get there

But in Hebrew, you can simply say:

• קל להגיע

Literally: easy to arrive/reach

This is a very common pattern in Hebrew:

• קשה להבין = it is hard to understand
• נעים לפגוש אותך = it is pleasant to meet you
• חשוב לדעת = it is important to know

So קל להגיע is completely natural Hebrew.

להגיע is the infinitive to arrive / to reach / to get to.

In this sentence, the best English translation is often to get to or to reach.

So:

• קל להגיע למזרח העיר = it is easy to get to the east of the city
• קל להגיע למערב העיר = it is easy to get to the west of the city

Even though להגיע often means to arrive, in sentences with destinations it can work like to get to.

Because ל־ means to.

So:

• למזרח העיר = to the east of the city
• למערב העיר = to the west of the city

This fits with להגיע, because you reach/get to a place.

Also notice that ל־ combines with ה־:

• ל + מזרח העיר would be to east of the city
• but here we mean to the east, so it becomes למזרח

Same with:

• למערב

Hebrew often uses a construct-style relationship between nouns for expressions like this.

• מזרח העיר = the east of the city
• מערב העיר = the west of the city

This is more natural and compact than המזרח של העיר, which is grammatically possible in some contexts but less natural here.

This pattern is very common:

• מרכז העיר = the city center
• דרום הארץ = the south of the country
• צפון העיר = the north of the city

So מזרח העיר is the normal way to say the east side/part of the city.

This is because of the construct relationship.

In מזרח העיר:

• מזרח = east of
• העיר = the city

When Hebrew uses this noun-noun structure, the definiteness often comes from the second word.

So מזרח העיר means the east of the city, even though מזרח itself does not have ה־.

The same thing happens in many phrases:

• בית הספר = the school literally house of the book
• ראש העיר = the mayor literally head of the city
• מרכז העיר = the city center

So מזרח העיר is already definite because העיר is definite.

גם ... וגם ... means both ... and ...

So:

• גם למזרח העיר וגם למערב העיר
• = both to the east of the city and to the west of the city

This is a very common Hebrew pattern.

Examples:

• גם אני וגם הוא = both I and he
• גם בקיץ וגם בחורף = both in summer and in winter

In your sentence, it emphasizes that both directions are easy to reach from the office.

Sometimes in casual speech people may simplify things, but the standard and clear structure for both ... and ... is:

• גם X וגם Y

So in this sentence, using both is the best choice:

• גם למזרח העיר וגם למערב העיר

If you remove one, the balance of the sentence changes, and it may sound less precise or less natural for the intended meaning.

For an English speaker, reach or get to is better here.

Why? Because English arrive often sounds incomplete without at/in:

• arrive at the east side of the city
• arrive in the west side of the city

But Hebrew להגיע ל־ works very naturally with destinations.

So in this sentence:

• קל להגיע... is best understood as it’s easy to get to...

That usually sounds more natural than it’s easy to arrive to..., which is not standard English.

That order is not impossible in every context, but מהמשרד שלי at the beginning is more natural if the speaker wants to emphasize the starting point.

Hebrew word order is flexible, but the sentence often begins with the frame or context:

• מהמשרד שלי = from my office

Then comes the comment:

• קל להגיע... = it’s easy to get...

So the sentence is organized like:

1. starting point / context
2. what is easy
3. the destinations

That makes it smooth and natural.

Yes, but the meaning would change slightly.

• קל להגיע = it is easy to get to
• אפשר להגיע = it is possible / one can get to

So:

• מהמשרד שלי קל להגיע... emphasizes convenience or ease
• מהמשרד שלי אפשר להגיע... emphasizes possibility

If the meaning is about good access and convenience, קל is the better choice.

Yes, in many contexts that is a very good translation.

Literally, מזרח העיר is the east of the city, but natural English often says:

• the east side of the city
• the eastern part of the city

The same applies to:

• מערב העיר = the west side / western part of the city

So even if the Hebrew is compact, the English equivalent may need a slightly fuller phrase.

A helpful way to break it down is:

• מהמשרד שלי = from my office
• קל להגיע = it is easy to get
• גם למזרח העיר וגם למערב העיר = both to the east of the city and to the west of the city

So the full structure is:

From my office, it is easy to get both to the east of the city and to the west of the city.

That is a very typical Hebrew sentence pattern:

• starting point or context
• adjective like easy
• infinitive like to get/reach
• destinations or objects