Baba ya ce mu je gona da wuri domin mu taimaka wa kaka a aikin tumatir.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Hausa grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Hausa now

Questions & Answers about Baba ya ce mu je gona da wuri domin mu taimaka wa kaka a aikin tumatir.

In this sentence, what exactly does Baba mean? Is it the same as uba?

Baba means father or dad, but it’s also used more broadly.

  • Baba can mean:
    • my/our father (often understood from context, even without saying na “my” or mu “our”)
    • an older man, or a man you respect (kind of like “sir” or “old man” in a respectful way)
  • Uba is a more formal word for father (often used in more formal speech, writing, or religious contexts).

In everyday spoken Hausa, people very often say Baba for “Dad,” so in this sentence Baba is most naturally understood as Dad or Father.

How does ya ce work? Does it literally mean “he said”?

Yes. ya ce literally means “he said”.

  • ya = he (3rd person masculine singular, perfective aspect)
  • ce = say

Together: ya ce = he said.

After ya ce, Hausa usually puts what was said directly, without any word like “that”. So:

  • Baba ya ce mu je gona…
    literally: Dad said we go to the farm…
    but idiomatically: Dad said (that) we should go to the farm… or Dad told us to go to the farm…

So English often needs that or told us to, but Hausa just uses ya ce plus the next clause.

Why is there no word meaning “that” after ya ce, like “Baba said that we should go…”?

Hausa normally doesn’t use a separate word for “that” in reported speech the way English does.

English:

  • Dad said *that we should go…*

Hausa:

  • Baba ya ce mu je gona…
    (literally: Dad said we go to the farm…)

The verb ce already introduces the reported clause, so you don’t add a separate “that”. The clause mu je gona da wuri domin mu taimaka… is just placed directly after ya ce.

What is the role of mu in mu je and mu taimaka? Does it mean “we” or “let’s”?

mu here marks the 1st person plural subject (“we”) in the subjunctive/irrealis mood.

In this kind of sentence:

  • mu je = that we go / let’s go
  • mu taimaka = that we help / let’s help

So mu is both:

  • the subject “we”, and
  • a signal that the verb is in this “should/let’s” form (subjunctive), not a plain present or past.

In English, we have to choose between:

  • Dad said we should go…
  • Dad said to us, “Let’s go…”

Both are covered in Hausa by Baba ya ce mu je…

Why is the verb je used here instead of tafi? Don’t they both mean “go”?

Both je and tafi are translated as “go”, but they’re used a bit differently:

  • je is very common when you mention a destination:

    • mu je gonalet’s go to the farm
    • mu je kasuwalet’s go to the market
  • tafi can mean:

    • to leave, depart: ya tafihe left / he went away
    • to go (more generally), often without stressing the specific destination

In many contexts either could be used, but mu je gona is particularly natural when you’re focusing on going to a particular place (here, the farm).

What does da wuri literally mean, and why is da there?

da wuri means “early” (in time).

Literally:

  • da – often means with, and, or is part of fixed expressions
  • wuriplace, but in this idiom it has an extended sense linked to time / opportunity

However, you should treat da wuri as a fixed expression meaning:

  • early, promptly, not late

Some examples:

  • Ka tashi da wuri.Wake up early.
  • Za mu tafi da wuri gobe.We will go early tomorrow.

So in the sentence:

  • mu je gona da wuri = we should go to the farm early.
What does domin mean here, and how is it different from saboda or don?

In this sentence domin introduces a purpose clause and means “so that / in order to”:

  • …da wuri domin mu taimaka wa kaka…
    = …early so that we can help Grandma/Grandpa…

General uses:

  • domin:
    • very commonly used for purpose:
      • Na zo domin in gani.I came (in order) to see.
  • don:
    • a shorter, more colloquial form in many dialects (same function as domin):
      • Na zo don in gani.
  • saboda:
    • more strongly “because (of)” / “due to”, giving a reason:
      • Na zo saboda kai.I came because of you.

In practice, domin/don can overlap with saboda, but in domin mu taimaka the idea is clearly purpose (“so that we help” / “in order to help”).

Why do we say mu taimaka wa kaka instead of just mu taimaka kaka? What does wa do?

wa is a preposition that marks the indirect object – the person you are helping, giving to, etc. It usually translates as “to/for”.

  • taimaka = help
  • mu taimaka wa kaka = that we help *to/for Grandma/Grandpa
    → natural English: *that we help Grandma/Grandpa

So:

  • mu taimaka wa kaka is structurally like:
    • we help *to grandma → *we help grandma

Leaving out wa (mu taimaka kaka) is not standard; wa (or ma) is normally required after taimaka when you mention who is being helped.

Is wa the only option, or can I also use ma in mu taimaka wa kaka?

You can also hear ma in many dialects, and it can work in a similar way to wa for indirect objects:

  • mu taimaka wa kaka
  • mu taimaka ma kaka

Both can be understood as that we help Grandma/Grandpa.

In many descriptions of standard Hausa, wa is the more strictly correct choice after verbs like taimaka, but ma is very common in everyday speech and also widely accepted. You will hear both.

What exactly does kaka mean? Is it grandmother, grandfather, or just “grandparent”?

kaka basically means “grandparent”, but in practice:

  • It can refer to either grandmother or grandfather.
  • Context often makes it clear; families know which person they’re talking about.
  • It can also be a polite or affectionate way to refer to:
    • an elderly woman → like “Granny”
    • an elderly man → like “Grandpa”

In this sentence kaka is usually understood as Grandma or Grandpa, depending on context. English forces you to choose; Hausa doesn’t always specify the gender here.

What is the function of a in a aikin tumatir?

a here is a preposition meaning “in / at / on (in the context of)”.

  • a aikin tumatir literally: in the work of tomatoes
    → idiomatic: in the tomato work / with the tomato work.

So:

  • mu taimaka wa kaka a aikin tumatir
    = that we help Grandma/Grandpa *with the tomato work / in the tomato farming job.*

Other examples:

  • a gidaat home
  • a makarantaat school
  • a aikiat work
Why is it aikin tumatir and not just aiki tumatir? What does the -n on aiki do?

aiki means “work / job / task” on its own.

When you connect two nouns in Hausa in a genitive (“of”) relationship, you often add a linking consonant to the first noun. For masculine nouns ending in a vowel, this is typically -n.

So:

  • aiki (work)
    • tumatir (tomato)
      aikin tumatir = the work *of tomato(es) → *tomato work / tomato farming / dealing with tomatoes.

This is called the construct or genitive construction:

  • gadon bababed of fatherfather’s bed
  • motar Malamcar of the teacherthe teacher’s car
  • aikin tumatirwork of tomatoestomato work / tomato-related job

So -n here is just a linker marking “of”.

Could I say aiki tumatir instead of aikin tumatir, or would that be wrong?

In standard Hausa, you need the linker -n, so aikin tumatir is the correct form.

  • aikin tumatir = natural and correct
  • aiki tumatir = sounds incomplete/unnatural to a native speaker in this context

There are situations where bare noun–noun sequences appear without the linker, but for this common “work of tomatoes” idea, aikin tumatir is the normal and expected structure.

How should I understand aikin tumatir meaning-wise? Is it picking tomatoes, planting them, selling them…?

Literally aikin tumatir is just “tomato work” – any work involving tomatoes.

It can cover:

  • planting tomatoes,
  • weeding around them,
  • watering them,
  • harvesting them,
  • sorting or carrying them,
  • even preparing them for sale.

The sentence doesn’t specify which exact task; it only says they’re going to help with the tomato work. Context (what season it is, what the family usually does) would tell you whether it’s planting, harvesting, etc.

Does ya ce mu je… mean “he said we went” or “he said we should go / he told us to go”? How does the tense work?

The tense/aspect applies like this:

  • ya ce is past/perfective: he said.
  • The mu je part is subjunctive / irrealis: that we (should) go / let’s go.

So Baba ya ce mu je gona… is best understood as:

  • Dad said (that) we should go to the farm…
    or
  • Dad told us to go to the farm…

It does not mean “Dad said we went to the farm”. For that kind of meaning you’d use a different structure, e.g.:

  • Baba ya ce mun je gona.Dad said that we went to the farm.
    (Here mun je is a completed action: we went.)

In your sentence, mu je is clearly an instruction/wish, not a completed action.