Log inSign up

Wir steigen in den Zug.

Wir steigen in den Zug.
We get on the train.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning German now

Questions & Answers about Wir steigen in den Zug.

Why is it in den Zug and not in dem Zug?

The preposition in can take either the accusative or the dative case, depending on the meaning:

  • Accusative (movement → where to?): going into/onto something
  • Dative (location → where?): being inside/on something

In Wir steigen in den Zug, you have movement into the train, so you ask:

  • Wohin steigen wir? – In den Zug. → accusative

That’s why it is den Zug (accusative masculine) instead of dem Zug (dative masculine).

Why is it den Zug and not der Zug?

Zug is a masculine noun:

  • Nominative: der Zug
  • Accusative: den Zug

Because of the preposition in with movement (see previous answer), you need the accusative. So:

  • Subject (doing the action): Der Zug fährt. – The train is going.
  • Object with movement into it: Wir steigen in den Zug. – We get on the train.

So den is simply the accusative form of der for masculine nouns.

Why can’t I just say Wir steigen den Zug without in?

You cannot drop in here, because steigen on its own does not mean to board in German.

  • steigen alone usually means to climb (e.g. auf den Berg steigen – to climb the mountain).
  • For vehicles, you need either:
    • a preposition: in den Zug steigen, in das Auto steigen
    • or the separable verb einsteigen: Wir steigen in den Zug ein.

So:

  • ❌ Wir steigen den Zug. – ungrammatical
  • ✅ Wir steigen in den Zug.
  • ✅ Wir steigen in den Zug ein.
What is the difference between steigen and einsteigen here?

In this context, both are closely related but used slightly differently:

  • in den Zug steigen
    Literally: to climb into the train
    Perfectly correct, sounds a bit more neutral/literal.

  • in den Zug einsteigen
    This emphasizes the idea of boarding a vehicle.
    It’s the more typical expression in everyday speech for buses, trains, planes, etc.

You’ll most often hear:

  • Wir steigen in den Zug ein.
  • Steigen Sie bitte ein! – Please get on (board)!

But Wir steigen in den Zug is grammatically fine and understandable.

Could I also say Wir steigen in den Zug ein? Would that be more natural?

Yes, Wir steigen in den Zug ein is very natural and very common.

Comparison:

  • Wir steigen in den Zug. – correct, slightly more neutral/literal.
  • Wir steigen in den Zug ein. – sounds like everyday idiomatic “We’re getting on the train.”

In spoken German, people will almost always include the ein with vehicles.

Why is it Wir steigen and not Wir steigt or Wir steigt an?

This is about verb conjugation and the correct verb:

  1. Conjugation of steigen in the present tense:
  • ich steige
  • du steigst
  • er/sie/es steigt
  • wir steigen
  • ihr steigt
  • sie/Sie steigen

For wir (we), the ending is -en, so wir steigen is correct.

  1. Why not steigt an?
  • ansteigen usually means to rise, to increase (prices, numbers, etc.):
    • Die Preise steigen an. – The prices are increasing.
  • It is not used for boarding vehicles.

For boarding you’d use einsteigen (with ein), not ansteigen.

Can this sentence also mean “We will get on the train” in the future?

Yes. German often uses the present tense for near future, especially when the context makes it clear:

  • Wir steigen in den Zug.
    Depending on context, this can mean:
    • We are getting on the train (right now).
    • We are getting on the train (soon / later today / tomorrow).

If you really want to emphasize the future, you can say:

  • Wir werden in den Zug steigen. – We will get on the train.

But in everyday speech, the simple present (Wir steigen in den Zug.) is very common for future plans.

Why is Wir capitalized but steigen is not?

German capitalization rules:

  • Nouns are capitalized: Zug, Auto, Bahnhof, etc.
  • Pronouns (like wir, du, er) are normally not capitalized,
    except at the beginning of a sentence.
  • Verbs are never capitalized in normal sentences.

In Wir steigen in den Zug.:

  • Wir is capitalized because it is the first word of the sentence.
  • steigen is a verb, so it is not capitalized.
  • Zug is a noun, so it is capitalized.
What is the grammatical role of Wir in this sentence?

Wir is the subject of the sentence:

  • Wir – subject (who is doing the action)
  • steigen – finite verb (conjugated)
  • in den Zug – prepositional object (where we are getting into)

You can see this by asking:

  • Wer steigt in den Zug? – Who is getting on the train? → Wir.

So Wir is in the nominative case as the subject.

Is there a difference between in den Zug and im Zug?

Yes, they express different things:

  • in den Zug → accusative, movement into the train

    • Wir steigen in den Zug. – We are getting onto the train.

  • im Zug = in dem Zug → dative, being inside the train

    • Wir sind im Zug. – We are on the train.
    • Wir sitzen im Zug. – We are sitting on the train.

So:

  • Going in: in den Zug
  • Being in: im Zug
Could you give similar example sentences with other vehicles?

Yes, the pattern is the same:

  • Wir steigen in den Bus (ein). – We get on the bus.
  • Wir steigen ins (= in das) Auto. – We get into the car.
  • Wir steigen in die Straßenbahn (ein). – We get on the tram.
  • Wir steigen ins Flugzeug (ein). – We board the plane.

And for being inside (no movement):

  • Wir sind im Bus. – We are on the bus.
  • Wir sitzen im Auto. – We are sitting in the car.
  • Wir sind im Flugzeug. – We are on the plane.
What is the plural of Zug, and how would the sentence change?

The plural of Zug is Züge.

If you want to say We get on the trains (several trains), you’d say:

  • Wir steigen in die Züge.

Explanation:

  • Plural nominative definite article: die Züge
  • Plural accusative is also die Züge, so you get:
    • in die Züge for movement into the trains.