Breakdown of Das Handtuch passt gut in meine kleine Regenjacke, die ich immer dabeihabe.
ich
I
in
into
immer
always
mein
my
klein
little
gut
well
die
that
das Handtuch
the towel
passen
to fit
die Regenjacke
the rain jacket
dabeihaben
to have with
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Das Handtuch passt gut in meine kleine Regenjacke, die ich immer dabeihabe.
What does passen mean in this sentence, and how is it used?
In this context, passen means “to fit.” When you say etwas passt in …, you mean “something fits into” or “fits inside” something else. Here, Das Handtuch passt gut in meine kleine Regenjacke literally says “The towel fits well into my small rain jacket.”
Why is the preposition in followed by meine (accusative) instead of dative?
German prepositions like in can take either the accusative or the dative, depending on whether you express movement/direction (accusative) or location (dative).
- Accusative (movement into): Das Handtuch passt in meine Jacke.
- Dative (static location): Das Handtuch ist in meiner Jacke.
Since the towel is being put into the jacket (movement), we use accusative: in meine Regenjacke.
How do I know the correct adjective ending on kleine in “meine kleine Regenjacke”?
After a possessive determiner (mein, dein, etc.), German uses weak adjective endings. For a feminine singular noun in the accusative case, the weak ending is -e. The pattern here is:
meine (possessive) + kleine (adjective-weak) + Regenjacke (feminine noun).
Why is passt in second position and gut directly after it? Could I reorder “gut”?
German main clauses follow the V2 (verb-second) rule: the finite verb (passt) must occupy the second slot. Adverbs of manner (like gut) typically come right after the verb: passt gut. You could stress something differently by reordering, but Das Handtuch passt gut in … is the most natural.
What is the function of die in “die ich immer dabeihabe”? Is it nominative or accusative?
die is a relative pronoun referring back to Regenjacke (feminine singular). In the clause ich habe die Jacke dabe i, it’s the direct object, so it’s in the accusative case. Feminine die looks the same in nominative and accusative, so you don’t see the difference in form here.
Why is habe at the end in die ich immer dabeihabe, and why does dabei attach to haben?
- Subordinate-clause word order: In a Nebensatz (here introduced by the relative pronoun die), the finite verb goes to the end.
- Separable-prefix verb: dabeihaben (“to have with you”) is a separable verb. In subordinate clauses, the prefix reattaches to the verb, yielding dabeihabe as one word.
Why is Regenjacke written as one word? Can it be split into “Regen Jacke”?
German forms compound nouns by simply joining words together. Regen (rain) + Jacke (jacket) → Regenjacke. Writing it separately as Regen Jacke is incorrect in standard German.
Could I use a different verb instead of dabeihaben, like mitnehmen or tragen, and how would the nuance change?
Yes. For example:
- die ich immer mitnehme (“that I always take with me”) focuses on the act of picking it up and carrying it along.
- die ich immer trage (“that I always wear”) emphasizes wearing it.
- dabeihaben stresses that you have it on your person or in your bag, whether worn or not.