Learn Hardcore French: L’organisatrice explique que c’est un honneur d’inviter autant d’artistes étrangers. - The organizer explains that it is an honor to invite so many foreign artists.

L’organisatrice explique que c’est un honneur d’inviter autant d’artistes étrangers.

The organizer explains that it is an honor to invite so many foreign artists.

Breakdown of L’organisatrice explique que c’est un honneur d’inviter autant d’artistes étrangers.

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching French grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning French now

Questions & Answers about L’organisatrice explique que c’est un honneur d’inviter autant d’artistes étrangers.

Why is it l’organisatrice and not l’organisateur? What does the ending -trice show?

The ending -trice usually marks a feminine form of certain profession nouns in French.
Here:

l’organisateur = the (male) organizer
l’organisatrice = the (female) organizer

So l’organisatrice tells us that the organizer is a woman.
Also, l’ is the elided form of la (feminine the) before a vowel: la organisatrice → l’organisatrice.

What is the role of que in explique que c’est…? Can it be omitted like that sometimes is in English?

Here que is a conjunction meaning that, introducing a subordinate clause:

L’organisatrice explique que… = The organizer explains that…

In French, this que cannot be dropped; you must say explique que c’est…, never just explique c’est….
So unlike English, where you can say “She explains (that) it’s an honor”, French requires que.

Why do we say c’est un honneur and not il est un honneur?

French strongly prefers c’est before a noun with an article:

C’est un honneur. ✅
Il est un honneur. ❌ (sounds wrong)

General rule:

Use c’est
- article + noun: C’est un honneur, C’est une idée, C’est le directeur.
Use il est mainly before adjectives or unmodified professions/nationalities:
Il est important, Il est professeur, Il est français.

Since un honneur is a noun with an article (un), French uses c’est.

Why is d’inviter used here? Why de + infinitive after un honneur?

Structures like C’est un honneur de + infinitive are very common in French:

C’est un honneur d’inviter… = It’s an honor to invite…

Many expressions with c’est + noun/adjective take de + infinitive to say what the action is:

C’est difficile de comprendre. – It’s hard to understand.
C’est une bonne idée de partir tôt. – It’s a good idea to leave early.

So de (contracted to d’ before a vowel) is simply the required preposition that links the idea un honneur to the action inviter.

What exactly does autant d’ mean, and how is it different from beaucoup de?

Autant de literally means as many / as much and often implies a comparison or a surprisingly large quantity:

autant d’artistes étrangers = so many foreign artists / as many foreign artists.

Beaucoup de simply means many / a lot of, with no built-in idea of equality or comparison:

beaucoup d’artistes étrangers = a lot of foreign artists.

In practice:

autant de often suggests “this many (compared to something else or to expectations)”.
beaucoup de just states “a large quantity”.

Why is there no article after autant de in autant d’artistes?

After adverbs of quantity like autant de, beaucoup de, trop de, peu de, assez de, French normally uses de + noun without an article:

autant d’artistes – so many artists
beaucoup de gens – a lot of people
trop de travail – too much work

So you say autant d’artistes, not autant des artistes, unless you have a very specific context referring to “as many of the artists” (a different, rarer construction).
The basic learner rule: after autant de, do not add un/une/le/la/les/des.

Why is étrangers in the masculine plural, and how would it change for female artists?

Adjectives must agree in gender and number with the noun they describe.
Here the noun is artistes, which is plural and (by default) treated as masculine or mixed gender, so the adjective is:

étrangers (masculine plural: -s ending)

The four main forms of the adjective étranger are:

masculine singular: étranger
feminine singular: étrangère
masculine plural: étrangers
feminine plural: étrangères

So:

des artistes étrangers = male or mixed group of artists
des artistes étrangères = all female artists

Why are d’artistes and d’inviter written with d’ instead of de?

This is just elision, a pronunciation simplification.
The preposition de becomes d’ before a word starting with a vowel or silent h:

de artistes → d’artistes
de inviter → d’inviter

The meaning doesn’t change at all; it’s still de.
French does this with several short words: le → l’, la → l’, je → j’, ne → n’, etc.

Could we also say L’organisatrice a expliqué que…? How would that change the meaning?

Yes. Both are correct, but the tense changes the time reference:

L’organisatrice explique que… – present: she is explaining now, or this is a general/ongoing statement.
L’organisatrice a expliqué que… – past (passé composé): she explained at some specific point in the past.

In the past version, you would often also shift c’est to c’était:

L’organisatrice a expliqué que c’était un honneur d’inviter…
→ The organizer explained that it was an honor to invite…

So the structure is the same; only the time frame and sometimes the internal tense (c’est / c’était) change.

Can we rewrite the sentence without c’est, like Inviter autant d’artistes étrangers est un honneur? Is that correct, and is there any difference?

Yes, Inviter autant d’artistes étrangers est un honneur is grammatically correct and means the same thing.

The differences are stylistic:

C’est un honneur d’inviter autant d’artistes étrangers.
– Very natural, common in spoken French; slightly more neutral and conversational.
Inviter autant d’artistes étrangers est un honneur.
– A bit more formal or written, and it puts more direct focus on the action Inviter… as the subject of the sentence.

Both are good French; the original version is simply the more typical everyday phrasing.